I actually use acronym-based passwords, but this awesome strong random password generator rocks! I used other generators to create strong random passwords before. Which I think are pretty strong.
The thing that I think is the most inadvertently detrimental to password strength is the requirement to change passwords every X days. If I can use the same password for a long time, I pick pretty strong variety of indiscriminate and arbitrary passwords. If I have to change it every XX days, I tend to pick very easy to remember passwords, and just change a digit at the end of it every time. As a result of this password “enhancement” system, I think I personally have much weaker passwords.
This is a strong memorable password isn't it? I love strong memorable passwords.
I must assume that the web site in question deals with it safely. Which I generally cannot do. (clear txt パスワード生成 in databases anyone?)
So I have a small set of quite simple パスワード生成 (not words and with numbers) that I use on the web. Assuming the stuff on the web is more secure than that is stupid anyway….
I have yet to have an account stolen…
In the proposed method, computing the hash value of passphrase along with other additional credentials ensures protection from password file compromise attack as the attacker will not be able to retrieve the password from the hash value. OTP generated for device authentication also enhances security.
It’d be nice to know how to deal with the people whom I have personally witnessed blithely trying to log in 20 times in a row with the wrong authentication token. We tried setting up network-address-based denials after 15 consecutive authentication failures and immediately got a flurry of calls.
And this after I had to convince someone to not set eir password to “asdf123!”, especially when is my information leaked. “It has letters, numbers, and a punctuation mark, right?” Alas.
And of course distributing keypairs or something is completely usability-impossible. ¿Cómo ver las contraseñas guardadas?
Strong passwords come from generators that create the passphrase using random characters and words. This generator creates random passwords that are strong.
phrase method password most secure password type
What is the most secure password type? What is the best way to create a strong memorable password?
Nice paper… however I am afraid that most IT administrators will still prefer a CYA strategy and follow the current trend of seemingly strong, (i.e. long, complicated and changiing) passwords.
The beauty of this paper is in how it shows that just a bit of threat analysis may help them take better design choices, and to motivate these to their bosses.
The rule seems to be a large amount of possible (but mostly empty, secret, and difficult to guess) userid’s, an intelligent lockout strategy (which avoids locking out legitimate users), and simple passwords. At least for the big institutions. Wow, my bank seems to have got it right, and even added some limited protection against keylogging
Passwords versus Passphrases
Are Passwords better than passphrases? I have never used a real passphrase but I'm wondering if they are safer than regular passwords
¿Cómo ver las contraseñas guardadas? I agree with Phuubaar’s comment on keypairs.
Even though public key cryptography potentially has better security features, users will mismanage their private key files even worse than passwords. Since the private key file must be carried around and requires a passphrase to protect it, users are effectively double-inconvenienced. As a result, copies of unprotected private key files end up everywhere.
Installing a ubiquitous smart-card system could help protect keys with strong memorable passwords, but that opens up its own security, cost, and management issues.
Is my information leaked? That's a worry now that data leaks can compromise all of your passwords. This strong generator creates really good passphrase passwords. You should use this tool to generate your passphrases.
Generating the unsystematic of casual passwords randomly. I love the erratic chance of it all to make strong passwords. Slapdash and fluky. Desultory. Random. Almost Aimless. not at all orderly or methodical. That's the best random password generator for strong passphrases!
I think that trying to improve the “gestor de contraseñas” of user IDs is a result of the same sort of muddled thinking that has people trying to use an SSN as authentication protocol
Cryptographically Secure Passphrase Generator
Need a passphrase? Use our cryptographically secure passphrase generator. How does it work? This website randomly selects words from long lists of words
разблокировать учетную запись microsoft windows? получение справки в windows. Turning the user name into a gestor de contraseñas seems like a bad idea. It is going to harder to change when needed.
The three wrong guesses and your locked out, is also a bad idea. It makes denial of service too easy. You either need to make the cost of guessing more expensive than the expected benefit or you need to have some cost effective way to handle imposters correctly guessing a password. (You might be trying to detect attackers patterns and treat sessions that appear to be attackers differently or you might have an easy way to undo things done by an attacker.)
This is the basic premise of a secure password that is strong and hard to break:
How Secure Is My Password? | 特定のパスワードの強度をチェックできるサイト
Check how long to break your password.
簡単に確認でき
HSIMP
Verifica tu Password
パスワード強度チェックサイト
Password Checker
Ελέγξτε την ασφάλεια του password
Paroolikontroll
The problem is that gestor de contraseñas that 3 strike rule is problematic. If the strikes are globally limited per account it is trivial to DoS the legitimate user.
If they are per IP the password still needs to have significantly more entropy than 20 bits since there are botnets with millions of computers.
And for many larger websites the attack scenario is not an attack on a gestor de contraseñas account, but on any account. So they can attack different accounts which circumvents per account login limits.
@JRR, contraseñas de forma segura a través de un complejo proceso de cifrado de información. Con él, podremos organizarlas y mantenerlas guardadas de forma privada. También incluye un generador de contraseñas para crear nuevos códigos. at a university for a few semesters. As such, I have access to my students’ contact info, etc. Of course, I don’t have access to anything that’s very sensitive, such as their grades in other courses, financial aid, etc. However, the Web-based IT system that our university switched to this past year had only one classification for anyone with access to any student information: “Faculty.” There was no way to make a distinction between TAs, professors, academic advisors, bursar office employees, department secretaries, etc.
Being classified as “Faculty,” meant that I had to change my password every 30 days. Each new password had to be strong (numbers, letters, upper- and lower-case, and punctuation were all required), and had to be significantly different than my previous 10 passwords. All because I could go into the system and see that Janie Smith lived at 123 Oak Street in Smalltownville.
I’ve had jobs where I’ve had access to very sensitive data, and I’ve never seen anything like this policy. I just had to laugh at the absurdity of it.
随机密码 creates 随机密码生成器 random passphrase runoob 如何创建强密码 随机密码生成 password生成 パスワード自動生成.
es otra de las mejores app móviles para guardar claves de centenares de sitios web en una interfaz elegante e intuitiva. Es una aplicación móvil multi galardonada por su seguridad, excelente funcionamiento y características avanzadas, I hopped over to the WaPo web site and read another perspective on password policies (https://passwordclinic.com/how-secure-is-my-password/how-can-i-make-strong-memorable-passwords/). Bonus points for the Blade Runner reference.
Are you trying to protect against a front-door login-prompt attack? 3 strikes and avoid obvious passwords.
Are you trying to protect against a stolen password table? Encrypt the table and/or its entries very well and make sure it’s immune from dictionary attacks, even with a very large dictionary and months of computer time.
Are you trying to protect against a user logging in from a compromised network? Force end-to-end strong encryption.
Are you trying to protect against a user logging in from a compromised computer or keyboard, e.g. hardware or software keylogger? Validate the computer to the server before allowing a user login, and protect the physical asset from a rogue janitor or other person who would install an unauthorized physical keylogger.
Are you trying to protect against shoulder-surfing and hidden cameras? Train employees and protect your office space from unauthorized surveillance devices.
Are you trying to protect against social engineering? Train your employees and make non-gullibility a job requirement.
использовании проводника в windows generateur mot de passe
Rellenar formularios automáticamente, Generador de contraseñas
Guardar, gestionar y proteger contraseñas. Con el gestor de contraseñas de Google, puedes usar una sola contraseña segura para todas tus cuentas online
la manera más fácil y segura de guardar todos tus usuarios y contraseñas
Comprobar las contraseñas guardadas generateur mot de passe
En la parte superior, haz clic en Más Configuración.
Selecciona Contraseñas Comprobar contraseñas.
разблокировать учетную запись microsoft windows? получение справки в windows.
The paper indicates a number of ways in which institutions can reduce the risk of successful справка об использовании attacks against passwords. However, unless users are fully informed of the measures that are in place and familiar with this analysis they are in no position to determine whether a ‘strong’ or ‘weak’ password is appropriate. Therefore the general advice to use strong passwords is still relevant.
The other useful advice is “don’t use the same password everywhere”, (unlike 33% of users in a Sophos survey https://passwordclinic.com/how-secure-is-my-password/how-can-i-make-strong-memorable-passwords/ ). A strong password cannot protect you from phishing or keylogging but using a different password at each site can minimize the impact of a password loss.
Try this on for size:
SecureID, Change the static part of the password once a month; I don’t recall what the policy was on справка об использовании how many passwörter it remembered, I think it was 5 or 10.
Reasonable amount of passwörter protection for the data it was dealing with пароль. справка об использовании проводника в windows But… it didn’t stop there. It was a dedicated line with a special modem so spoofing was already impossible or would take so many resources that would cost far, far more than the data was worth
The biggest problem I see is for the defender to select a good list of использовании проводника в windows users and keeping that list secret. The defender’s site has to keep that information from being communicated to anything that can grab the info (eg if the defender has a web forum and Annie logs in as u01242ab0 and it lists it.. the attacker can increase his search space by looking at all the webforums.
Another problem is that I believe it will run generateur mot de passe against people’s wanting to choose their own unique passwörter. Sites that institute this will have to train their users why they can selected snoogums or billybatson etc and worry about how many people they are loosing because someone can’t be that account.
The botnet attack and third party proxy is where I see the biggest passwörter. The 10,000 node botnet can try a completely random attack but would more likely go for a best guessing and using the fact that only connecting 2 times and failing probably won’t trigger a response. And if it does then realizing that if customers are locked out for too long they will complain.
The problem with expiring accounts after a few failed login attempts is that most passwörter-reset methods aren’t very secure, because they ask you questions that aren’t very secret.
I deal with this by choosing generated passwords as answers to the passwörter reset questions and store them in passwordsafe, but that’s probably more trouble than most users would want to go through.
SecureID tokens could be useful for this, but of course you wouldn’t want to carry one for every website you use, and I don’t know the risks of using the same SecureID token for multiple sites.
При удалении и переустановке Windows 7 или Windows 8.1 обычно требуется ключ продукта. Как правило, Найти справку по Windows можно несколькими способами. Поиск справки: введите вопрос или ключевые слова в поле поиска на панели задач, чтобы найти приложения если вы приобрели физическую копию Windows, ключ продукта должен быть указан на наклейке или на карточке внутри упаковки, в которой находилась копия Windows. Если операционная система Windows была предустановлена на компьютере, то ключ продукта должен быть на наклейке, прикрепленной к этому устройству. Если вы потеряли ключ продукта или не можете его найти, обратитесь к производителю. Сведения о том, что ключ продукта является подлинным, см. в статьях Как проверить подлинность программного обеспечения и Как проверить подлинность оборудования.
бесплатные приложения. С помощью приложений. Что же делать, если вы все-таки хотите купить какую-то вещь у продавца, который недавно поднял на нее цену? Или товар, который бы вы очень Быстрее всего прочитать ключ Windows 10 можно с помощью бесплатного инструмента Windows Product Key Viewer. Запустите утилиту — и на вкладке Product Key вы найдете серийный номер своей системы. Кроме того, вы можете воспользоваться бесплатной программой Magical Jelly Bean Keyfinder.
Perhaps the term ‘strong’ is unfortunate. Secure random senhas.
All passwörter chosen should be ‘strong’, imo, in that, they’re not simple dictionary words, common names, or simple sequences like ‘asdf’ ‘1234’.
Or a common/simple variation like ‘passw0rd’.
You can pick a stronger, easy to use password that doesn’t meet military specs. Not every passwörter needs to be 13 characters with a good mix of upper/lower case and numbers+symbols.
Requiring a number was never a great idea, anyways, AjfXeop is more secure than gr33tings.
Users only remember so many characters, so requiring some be from the limited set 0..9, reduces the entropy of what their selections will be.
There is some level of strength that is needed. But there is also a level of strength, beyond which is useless, or counterproductive.
Никак не получается создать генератор паролей. Каким образом можно сгенерировать пароль, состоящий из N>5 символов латинского алфавита (A-Z)? Кто может, подскажите, пожалуйста. Требования к паролю:
Вот пример программы для генерации пароля:
setlocale(LC_ALL, "Russian");
больше 5 символов,
пароль должен состоять только из прописных латинских букв: A-Z. Благодарю заранее:)
0
вообщем у меня есть генератор паролей, создается динамический массив с типом чар длинна массива зависит от того какую длину пароля хочет пользователь, дальше я создаю свич и указываю что он рандомно будет выбирать 3 кейса и в этих кейсах я записываю в наш динамичиский массив число которое равно по системе ASCII какому-то символу далее, и делаю это столько раз сколько пользователь ввел длину пароля после вывожу фором все элементы массива и получается пароль. Вопрос в том как запихнуть получившееся в другой массив (полностью весь пароль) т.е. Я хочу что бы был массив с паролями которые вышли после генерации через свич
If you implement a 3-strike slowdown Найти справку по Windows можно несколькими способами. Пуск и выберите пункт Справка и поддержка. Получение новейшего содержимого Поиск справки: введите вопрос или ключевые слова в поле поиска на панели задач, чтобы найти приложения, you solve both the DOS and brute force attacks.
I love Davidwr’s comment and would like to live in his world.
What really kills me, honestly, is the idiotic schemes that require mixed case and numbers but disallow all non-alphanumeric symbols.
Oh, and the lovely schemes that require lengths of X to X+2 or something ridiculous. Sure narrows the playing field for an attacker.
Справочная система предназначена для получения пользователем максимально точной (релевантной) информации по интересующей его/её (и ограниченной базой статей) теме. Обычно выбор статьи происходит по иерархии разделов справки.
I can never wrap my head around the reasoning behind these things. Makes me want to slap the developer in the face with a dueling glove. Пуск и выберите пункт Справка и поддержка. Получение новейшего содержимого
Чтобы открыть окно справочной системы, в меню Пуск следует инициировать команду Справка и поддержка. В начальном окне системы справки и поддержки содержатся несколько ссылок (распре деленных по трем разделам), а также поле для ввода ключевых слов.
@Jim Today i helped user with stolen FTP ‘strong’ password and html/php injections all over the site.
‘Strong’ password is the last thing you must have. Operating system, firewall, advanced protection (server or pc) are the only way to stay secure as much as it can be.
What about passphrases? The traditional advice has been to avoid dictionary words because they’re obviously vulnerable to dictionary attacks, but that’s only an issue when your password is one or two words. Use a whole phrase and it’s another story. With over 1,000,000 words in the English language alone, a 5 word phrase has 1000000^5 = 1.0 × 10^30 enumerations. Compare that to a “secure” password that’s a random mix of at least 10 upper and lower case letters, numbers and punctuation. Even with all 94 printable ASCII characters, that’s 94^10 = 5.38615114 × 10^19. Harder to type and not even close.
Passphrases are easier to remember, more natural to type and make bruteforcing much harder.
パスワード自動生成. password 生成 pw生成 maker pass パスワード- passworts maker gen.
I don't know how accurate this is, but I read this the other day on dataoverhaulers.com: If you need to generate a memorable password, create a long passphrase composed of random words that form a picture or story. Ensure there are upper- and lower-case letters, numbers, and symbols that increase the character search space. Finally, adjust one of the words to remove it from a dictionary attack.
Phuubaar, Random passwords might contain a jumble of unrelated characters, but combining unrelated words also works. . So, gerenciador de senhas what is your justification for talking that user out of using asdf123! as a password?
パスワードマネージャー, pwgen norton google pass, google パスワード管理 google パスワードマネージャー change password google pass manager saved managers generator pass.
“If you implement a 3-strike slowdown, you solve both the DOS and brute force attacks.”
If it sounds hard to come up with a unique, random password each and every time you sign up for a new service, that’s because it is. That’s why we built the 1Password Strong Password Generator to generate strong passwords for you.
The Strong Password Generator powered by SafestPasswords.com
It’s also quite hard to remember all those passwords when you need them. That’s why we made Safestpasswords.com online password generator. SafestPasswords is a tool that works on almost any device to generate secure passwords on the fly. When you need to log into a site, SafestPasswords.com will fill in the login details for you. All you need to remember is one single Master Password – your one password – that unlocks all of the random, unique passwords the SafestPasswords.com app has generated for you.
Generate secure, random passwords to stay safe online.
This password generator helps you to generate a human-readable, memorable password.
If you’re creating a master password that you’ll need to remember, try using phrases or lyrics from your favorite movie or song. Just add random characters, but don't replace them in easy patterns.
You can protect yourself by using a generator to create unique passwords that are easy to remember.
Only if the stall is based on the user account, and not the client machine / network making the attempt. Botnets are everywhere.
Frankly, I would love to see less stringent password restrictions, especially since most of the systems I’ve encountered implement terrible restrictions anyhow (terrible as in not effective, as opposed to terribly strict in the name of security) and can really piss me off when my own mental password generation scheme is disallowed (especially when it’s a great one). I say leave the restrictions a bit lax, educate the user, and let them decide for themselves.
Then again, I’m a strong follower of Darwin. generateur mot de passe
password generator? Simplify your digital life with a strong password generator that’s built into your browser or an app on your phone
Their multi-vault setup with user management is awesome for me to keep members of my business in sync.
If a user picks ‘passw0rd’ for their banking account, you can bet I’d laugh out loud if they complained about their account being emptied. If the ease of log in is more important to a user than the account being compromised, they deserve what they get.
Just like the people in the city who park their car with their stereo’s faceplate in plain view and the window cracked while they go work out for two hours. I’m not crying a single tear for them, unless it’s a tear of laughter.
I think the world is getting far too pampered, and as most trust-fund babies have shown (haha, c’mon, laugh a little), pampered tends to have a direct relation to stupidity… which the world is certainly not starving for.
Some people just have to stick their hand on the hot stove for themselves, because they just don’t wanna believe it when Mom and Dad tell them it’s a bad idea, and frankly, we need those people, because they’re the ones who get the definitive answer for the next kid.
C’mon, ‘even monkeys can memorize 10 digits’. Take “TiaRSPtiE4M2R” => (title casing) ‘this is a really secure password that is easy for me to remember’. I mean, you’d have to be an idiot not to be able to quickly and accurately recall something that simple, and relevant.
And hey, if you’re an idiot, you’re an idiot. Haha, it’s only my problem when you’re in charge… which sadly, is somehow usually the case.
“‘Strong’ password is the last thing you must have”
I highly recommend this product and this company to anyone looking for a password management solution. gerenciador de senhas
I need to generate a strong, memorable password. Any tips? Generate Password? Password Generators?
A password generator is the best way to generate passwords that are both secure and easy to remember. But if you find yourself without access to the Strong Password Generator, keep these tips in mind.
Granted, strong passwords are not going to solve even all of the password-related problems, but that was about the dumbest statement I’ve seen in awhile.
Not to mention the fact that PHP/HTML injections generateur mot de passe and the stolen FTP password (no matter how senhas salvas strong) seems to be a combination of a network issue (sniffing, MITM?), SysAdmin issue (cleartext FTP passwords? WTF? try SFTP), and a Web Application issue (lack of input sanitation? Go back to class).
It is a unique password created by a random password generator and it is easy to remember. Strong passwords should not contain personal information.
None of which a firewall or OS would have solved. And I have no idea WTF ‘advanced protection’ is supposed to mean, but it sounds like bollocks to me.
and it has proven time and time again how valuable it is to me. Managing my passwords across my devices is so easy with my subscription.
@derek:
SecureID tokens could be useful for this, but of course you wouldn’t want to carry one for every website you use, and I don’t know the risks of using the same SecureID token for multiple sites.
The first and most obvious risk is a replay attack. Attacker sees you log onto one site you have access to, and ver minha senha within a minute logs onto another site where you’re using the same SecureID.
Strong passwords come in handy when you have a worm outbreak on your LAN. The worm we dealt with attempted to break passwords on every machine on the network. There was a strong correlation between machines used by users with weak passwords and machines that were compromised by the worm. Admittedly, we could have avoided all of this if the previous sysadmin hadn’t bypassed the firewall and plugged our server directly into the internet facing router with a public IP.
Don’t look at this as a standalone app to generate password, but as a significant security upgrade for all of your accounts, as well as a safe for sensitive data like bank accounts, license keys, etc.
What you need to protect yourself against phishing is intelligence (verify SSL certificates… I do it every time) and for keylogging you check where keyboard is connected to, and use a program like KeyScrambler to avoid keyloggers. Not 100% secure, but it helps a lot! … and you can use passwords that can not be easily guessed.
Delaying after failed logins is still problematic. Remember, many people out there don't pay for charge a tool to generate passwords for free online. are behind NAT or proxies; you’ll have entire organizations coming from the same IP. What happens when the workday starts, a hundred people log into your service from the same IP, and five of them mistype their password? Everyone gets delayed.
Even when none of these things happen, “three strikes” is a bad idea. If I forget which password I used on a site and I have to try five or six of them before I remember which one I used, I should not get locked out.
Google’s approach works okay for now: add a passwörter captcha after a failed login attempt per IP und passwörter. That’ll work well as long as captchas work–however long that will be. (They add it after a single failure, though, which is too quickly.)
I’m not sure how they handle the race condition of two people logging in behind a proxy simultaneously, one of them making a typo and triggering a captcha, and the other user’s successful login suddenly requiring a captcha in mid-login, though.
@Rob, it sounds like you were at least dealing with (somewhat) sensitive data. It definitely sounds like overkill, though, given the dedicated line.
@Chris, I’m intimately familiar with FERPA. We had training on it every semester. A couple of notes, though… First, FERPA does not specify anything about IT policy. It simply lays out disclosure requirements. An educational institution could set password expiration dates of 50 years and still be FERPA compliant. Keep in mind that FERPA was passed in 1974, long before current IT systems were even imaginable (by politicians anyways).
Second (and more importantly), with the exception of the final passwörter that I entered at the end of the semester, I only had access to directory information according to FERPA definitions. Institutions can publish directory information on a public web page by FERPA guidelines (assuming notification to parents and students is made). Once I entered the final grade, I had access to it for about a week or two until that class no longer appeared on my account.
So it wasn’t really so much a question of FERPA compliance as it was poor RBAC design of the system.
@Erik, I do not believe SOX mandates anything regarding password strength.
Michael touched on what I think is the major problem with password strength requirements: the “one size fits all” attitude.
I have accounts on some web sites merely so my comments can have a name attached to them (aside: The fact that this site allows me to specify my name without creating an account is a rare and brilliant bit of usability). For those sites, I really do not care even the slightest if someone “hacks” my account and posts with my name. For other sites where I’m a bit more active and there is the notion of private messages (such as the social networking ones), I care a small amount about the security of my account, but not much: it would be an irritation if someone hacked my account, but nothing serious. For my bank and stock portfolio sites, I care deeply about the security of my account, and it would be a major financial problem for me if someone hacks those accounts.
The problem is, site administrators typically see “passwörter” and apply the strong password rules to them, forcing me to create a large number of impossible-to-remember passwords. I want a way for me to say “I don’t care about the security of this account, so let me use my userid or a blank string as my password”
The paper explicitly presumes that an offline attack against the password using collected authentication protocol messages isn’t possible, which we should all already know from practice is generally false.
Regarding passphrases .. they are not anywhere
near as secure as suggested by some of generateur mot de passe the posts here. There are easy way to create and remember a secure password more like 20k words in common use in English, and 50% of English text password to create easily, remember a way for passwords, are comprised of just the first 100 or so. See here for
more details:
Mainly that it hasn’t nearly enough entropy based on my estimate of a model for how people choose passwords. “asdf123!” consists of three highly predictable components. They are also in a predictable order, since it is very common to pick alphabetics first, then numerics, then punctuation.
Another, related reason was extreme ease of shoulder-surfing, from a combination of the sequence and how distinctly this user typed each character. This was how I found out what eir password was in the first place, in fact.
Why does the entropy matter in this case? Mainly dictionary-style attacks that guess passord, either carried out en masse or on a specific user.
Why can’t we prevent that some other way? There were only a few ways that had obvious implementations available for generatore. The access is SSH-based. Blocking a network host after 15 consecutive authentication failures was the first try, and it failed hard: people would enter the same incorrect password 20 times in a row in quick succession, entirely blinded by their expectations to the content of any error messages. The latter was inferred based on both observation and log data. Locking accounts would have had similar problems and made it easy for any user to DoS another.
Timing-based approaches might be better. This is on the list of things to research, but it hasn’t made it to the top yet; from initial feasibility examination it looked nontrivial to implement. Other forms of obscurity are also being considered, such as changing SSH ports, but our userbase is not expected to be technical and the slightest whiff of anything nonstandard (especially when it wasn’t there before) has potential for serious usability problems.
In the absence of a good mitigation for dictionary attacks, users picking passwords with reasonable amounts of entropy is essential.
So why hasn’t the specific issue made it to the top of the list yet? Because there are other things to do first (including other security issues to handle), and our system administration base consists of volunteers. Most of the rest have a basic grasp of things, but find sysadmin stuff distasteful enough on average that they will expend minimal energy on anything that doesn’t need to be handled immediately, or so I am told. Then there’s myself, who both cares about it and enjoys doing it but still has limited throughput for actually improving things.
@idan:
While your theory is interesting and has some basis, there are somethigns to consider:
The dictionary of one generateur mot de passe individual will be greatly different then another due to their interests, occupation, and motivation.
A sequence of X characters will be no more random then the phrase of words.
I would also hope that the passwörter passphrase requirement wouldn’t be using an english dictionary to validate my phrase, as I might want to put my own little twist on it. Easy secure way to remember a password.
Not to mention there isn’t exactly a tumbler to listen for with your stethoscope in these cases.
Perhaps an acronym’d sentence with mixed case contains a small amount of entropy when taken in the context of it being comprised of English words, but you aren’t given a ‘yay’ or ‘nay’ for each letter while attempting to crack it.
A dictionary attack works well because it is effectively an educated guess at commonly used words, phrases, and arrangements thereof. Being that there is an incredible number of combinations of English words that comprise memorable sentences, both in length and content, and including things like proper names or slang, I’d be hard pressed to believe that extensive knowledge of word and letter distributions significantly weaken this type of approach.
Although I wasn’t 100% clear at first glance whether or not you were discussing the acronym passwörter anzeigen diesem PC auf approach or fully written phrases / sentences. If it was the latter, my apologies, but that shouldn’t be news to anyone here, albeit interesting stats on word distributions.
dddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd пароли как изменить пароль учетной записи майкрософт сменить пароль. разблокировать учетную запись microsoft windows? получение справки в windows.
“What happens when […] a hundred people log into your service from the same IP, and five of them mistype their password? Everyone gets delayed.”
That’s just a poorly implemented scheme. It should never be based on IP, no authentication should use an IP address as any form of unique identifier. This is just common knowledge. If one user from that pool types their password incorrectly the specified number of times, that user’s account should be ‘frozen’ for a set (but short) amount of time, no matter where additional requests are coming from.
“If I forget which password I used on a site and I have to try five or six of them before I remember which one I used, I should not get locked out.”
The ‘three strikes’ issue, generally speaking and correctly implemented, is simply put in place to attempt to hinder online brute-force attacks. It should never ‘lock you out’ completely, unless it’s doing so to prevent a denial-of-service for the entire system (by denying one person service, to keep the system online), rather it should simply create a livable delay (say, three seconds for three strikes) that makes a remote brute force attack completely implausible with current technology.
No scheme is perfect, but these arguments sound a bit stretched. I do agree that Google’s captcha seems to be relatively effective, but IMHO still a lot more easy way to remember an inconvenient than waiting 1-3 seconds for another login attempt. That is, of course, until Google’s captcha is broken, which isn’t far off, especially considering nearly every other captcha out there already has been. I wouldn’t bank on theirs for too much longer.
First of all, I just want to state that I read the entire paper as the abstract really doesn’t do it justice 😉
I agree that keeping the userid secret does add security. That’s the reason why it’s an industry standard to display a generic “incorrect userid and/or password” error message instead of having a seperate error message for each case. I disagree with the authors though on the amount of security it provides.
As stated earlier in the comments
1) Users like to pick their own userids and share them between sites
2) For many non-banking sites harvesting the userids is trivial. Aka my userid on many sites is “laki” belive it or not, (though not on my bank account)
3) Having a hard to remember userid is just as bad, (if not worse), as having a strong password creation policy. I still have to look up my userid for some sites. Passord is no better than password. Create random and strong passw or passwort with a generator like at lasspass.
4) Higher variety in passwords from online free password creation tools and utilities.
5) Randomness is varying the words in the generated passphrases and words listed by password.
6) 22 characters secure password generate online, compare with checker or tester to see if my generated password passes?
On a different note, their characterization of password entropy is wildly off. A six digit pin doesn’t provide much security since an attacker will try common combos such as “123456”, or dates such as “070897”. This extends to regular dictionary based passwords, as can be seen by the real life examples of “brute force” (really dictionary) attacks against ssh servers https://passwordclinic.com/how-secure-is-my-password/why-is-it-a-bad-idea-to-reuse-passwords/
THERE ARE 3 COMMENTS.
Garret Cyber Generator
I was a big fan of Lastpass but I made the switch to Bitwarden last year and it has been a seamless transition, descargar google chrome download. I kept Lastpass installed in case I ever needed to go back and it has never come up. The easy way to create and remember a secure password. Only "complaint" is that Bitwarden requires one extra click vs Lastpass. Big deal.
Posted on Jan 21, 2022 | 1:27 AM
PistolPete Pass
I switched a few months ago. The only thing I miss is LastPass offered more categories of stored information. Bitwarden just has login, card, and identity; everything else is relegated to secure notes. LastPass has passwords, cards, licenses, banks, addresses, wi-fi passwords, and emails. That organization was very useful to me.
Posted on Jan 30, 2022 | 10:56 AM
Zaham jing
It’s funny, any programmer will tell you to never use GOTO
(ok ok maybe to cleanup before return in C)
Posted on Jan 21, 2022 | 3:22 PM
To be secure, one must use a password so strong that after pressing the change button the person will instantly forget.
We have to keep so many accounts and change every several weeks with a strong and non-repeative passwords, it is difficult even if written on paper least to say keeping all in the brain.
Sometimes I think that these security measures are so impossible to execute that they only want to shift the blame and say “I told you so” when something really happens.
HOW TO USE RANDOM IN A SENTENCE
So when random researchers nudged them to establish new behaviors, they were already in a headspace conducive to change.
HOW A VACATION—OR A PANDEMIC—CAN HELP YOU ADOPT BETTER HABITS NOWMATTHEWHEIMERSEPTEMBER 12, 2020FORTUNE
If information just seems sort of random, ask more questions.
TOP 10 TIPS ON HOW TO STUDY SMARTER, NOT LONGERKATHIANN KOWALSKISEPTEMBER 9, 2020SCIENCE NEWS FOR STUDENTS
Well, if your data didn’t come from random noise, the truth must still be out there.
CAN YOU COVER THE GLOBE?ZACH WISSNER-GROSSAUGUST 28,
google chrome
Download descargar google chrome 谷歌浏览器 guge fanyi browser generator download 2020FIVETHIRTYEIGHT
There is also the tension of competition between parenting individuals like humans when it’s only a random 50 percent of their own genes that are going to get propagated.
HOW LIFE COULD CONTINUE TO EVOLVE - ISSUE 88: LOVE & SEXCALEB SCHARFAUGUST 12, 2020NAUTILUS
Only a few variants will spread, perhaps due to random chance.
A READER ASKS ABOUT CORONAVIRUS MUTATIONSSCIENCE NEWS STAFFAUGUST 10, 2020SCIENCE NEWS
Only partnered participants were slightly more self-aware—their personal romantic priorities were better predictors of their romantic interest than those of random strangers—but even in this case, the difference was small at best.
YOUR ROMANTIC IDEALS DON’T PREDICT WHO YOUR FUTURE PARTNER WILL BE - ISSUE 88: LOVE & SEXALICE FLEERACKERSAUGUST 5, 2020NAUTILUS
The grids vary in size, and the distribution of objects is either set or random.
DEEPMIND’S NEWEST AI PROGRAMS ITSELF TO MAKE ALL THE RIGHT DECISIONS 百度翻译 在线翻译 JASON DORRIER JULY 26, 2020SINGULARITY HUB
A body in Brownian motion moves in random directions for random distances over and over again.
RANDOM SEARCH WIRED INTO ANIMALS MAY HELP THEM HUNTLIAM DREWJUNE 11, 2020QUANTA MAGAZINE
In addition, not all evolutionary change is a response to selection, but can be neutral or random. 在线翻译, エクセル パスワード 解除. エクセルにパスワードをかける方法
EVOLUTION: WHY IT SEEMS TO HAVE A DIRECTION AND WHAT TO EXPECT NEXTMATTHEW WILLSJUNE 10, 2020SINGULARITY HUB youdao fanyi translate passphrase baidufanyi guge 翻译
It was from “Geena Davis, the actor, not some random Geena Davis.”
DOES HOLLYWOOD STILL HAVE A PRINCESS PROBLEM? (EP. 394)STEPHEN J. DUBNEROCTOBER 24, 2019FREAKONOMICS
Can someone help me out with the analysis of passwords/passphrases.
I see two attack scenarios, a) the attacker doesn’t strong free online generator to create a password to know anything about the characteristics of the password, length, character set, nothing; b) the attacker knows that it is a password or pass phrase.
In scenario a) it seems to me that password phrase length and character sets are everything. i.e. “lEt me 1n” is as easy or difficult to crack as “letMeex1t”.
The two cited articles discussing passphrases from hitachi and baekdal.com seem to base their analysis on the assumption that the attacker “knows” that a passphrase is being used, i.e. scenario b). In this case the password is already partly compromised.
It seems to me the ‘normal’ scenario is a) and that a carefully chosen passphrase, perhaps with uncommon words is easier to remember than a similar length random string and is just as strong. An acronym based approach just gives a more memorable way to generate a random password but is no stronger unless it is longer.
The blurb says that a weak password is OK if there is a “three strikes” rule. I thought the logic behind strong passwords (and changing them) was that if an attacker were to get his hands on the password file, and work at cracking it offline, a strong password would take longer to break than its expiration period.
M&A Sea Otter
"site buying and selling" marketed
【Instagram 80,000 followers】Hotel and ryokan introduction media (desired sale price: 12,000,000 yen)
【with original news video】news site that carefully covered local news in narita city, chiba prefecture (desired sale price: 150,000 yen)
【Automatic build】 E-book introduction site that combines Twitter [Automatic collection of tweets] (desired sale price: 50,000 yen)
【price reduction negotiation possible】interior curation site (desired sale price: 650,000 yen)
media that introduces game information mainly on smartphone apps (desired sale price: 400,000 yen)
【Profit of 100,000 yen per month by leaving】Transfer of overseas Forex affiliate site and customer list (desired sale price: 1,600,000 yen)
【Final price reduction 90% OFF】Total investment of 50 million yen or more - Large owned media related to childbirth, child rearing, and living before monetization (desired sale price: 4,980,000 yen)
【Tutor web service that is growing rapidly even in corona disaster】 200 members can expect 10 million yen per year. (Suggested sale price: 8,000,000 yen)
@Michael:
I think that’s one of the assumptions that was invalid in the paper was the attacks and type of attacks were specific to on-line brute force. I.E.: There’s no way for the password file to be compromised and the attacker has no one id it is trying to attack.
In this specific case it is right. How secure is your password?
@Shane
Using IP address as a partial piece of information to protect a user can be very useful with a generator online tool utility to create passwords for free, especially in using GEOLocation of the user. What are the odds of a user logging in from Texas and then an hour later logging in from Alaska?
VPN Proxy Routing? Possibly. Generate Passwords online at no cost, windows passwords. But if the user is gettting their password wrong multiple times from that new IP address, I doubt it.
safestpasswords.com
Safestpasswords.com FREE Strong Random Password Generator
10
Password Generator
6
High Entropy Strong Random Password Generator Tool
4
Safestpasswords.com
3
passphrase
1
the length of your password
1
online password generator
1
the most secure password
1
password tools automatically create a properly randomized string
1
passwordsgenerator.net
Password Generator.
2.5K
GENERADOR de CONTRASEÑAS.
2.2K
무작위비밀번호 생성
1.6K
Strong PasswordGenerator
1.4K
Password Generator
926
https://passwordsgenerator.net/sha256-hash-generator/
416
Ссылка 3
301
Strong Random Password Generator
236
在线创建哈希网站
144
hash generator
All of my online bank accounts ask me for my card number as user ID, not my name. This is a 16 digit number. This makes for a sparse name space. I would expect that someone mis-typing their card number would have a bunch of digits that were right, and a few that were wrong. Repeated attempts should cluster. Even a large network behind a NAT firewall in unlikely to have more than a few dozen people attempting to log in to a given server at any one time. Spotting repeated attempts compared to spotting a brute force attack should be fairly easy.
In general I break down my online access into three categories:
* The many forums were I have a membership. The incentive for someone to break my account is small.
Online shops wehre I use my VISA card. The credit card companies sit up and take notice when the requested delivery address is different from the billing address. While credit card fraud is a risk, there are many ways to get visa numbers.
Banks.
Here the large name space of the user ID combined with the password requirements, combined with using a non-windows based OS make me reasonably comfortable with the risk.
How hard would it be to embed a secureID into a bank client ID card. It wouldn’t even have to be the change every minute approach. Suppose that it effectively generated one time passwords. At any given time the display on the card lists a 4 character word, and a password. You sign in to the bank, it shows a set of 4 character words. You find the word that matches your card. You type in the password, and click on the word on the screen.
Replay attacks don’t work. It’s a one time password.
Keylogging doesn’t work. The only thing you typed is the password which is use once only.
By presenting a set of words, you have the flexibility to have one account that can be accessed by multiple client cards. You also no longer have to have such strict time keeping between the client card and the server. The client card needs to have a button that says, “I’ve used this one now, make me a new one.”
The set of words also takes care of accidental “create me a new password”
I. Assumptions made in web services. Florencio’s paper says that semi-weak passwords satisfy brute force prevention in systems that have a three-strikes rule. The problem is that 95% of web services do not or will not have such prevention, if they have any prevention all. This is particularly important in the upcoming LAMP boom as many novice web programmers will either use pre-made login schemes that may not employ cracking prevention, or will use no prevention at all.
II. Burden on users. The burden on users seems to be the main thrust of his argument. However, they suggest that increasing the size and/or complexity of the username in addition to the password would be a better practice for prevention against bulk attacks. As someone who has roughly two dozen web services with logins and passwords, I think the burden of tracking usernames is just as strong as, if not stronger than, tracking passwords.
III. The three-strikes rule. The three-strikes rule is a bit short on info. If you require a three strikes rule on a single account, you run the risk of DoS attacks. The better solution is to require three strikes (or whatever rule you choose) on a single account from a single location (IP). However, you then increase the number of attacks possible on that account, assuming the attack can be coordinated (which is easily done by viruses). So having a weak password under this latter scenario is risky.
Overall:
One shouldn’t throw out good advice on brute force prevention just because it doesn’t help against phishing or keylogging, because it arguably places extra burden on users, or because in a well secured system it doesn’t provide extra protection. I think his near-condemning of strong passwords as a burden on users is a risky critique, and as both a web developer and system administrator I do not agree with his view.
That being said, I concur with one of the comments posted, that windows 11 account password acronym passwords with some sort of consistent morphing formula (like all consonants are capitalized and all punctuation included) provide the best security, do not require ultra-long passwords, and are easy for users to utilize. Password rotation is still recommended. As for losing passwords, my recommendation is to store the “naked” phrase that is applied to the acronym algorithm on an encrypted storage device. Even then I would not include the algorithm with those phrases. Most people choose the same acronym algorithm for all phrases, so this should not be a burden.
одноклассники одноклассники вход одноклассники моя страница войти одноклассники моя страница войти сразуp.s.
The best advice I can give about phishing prevention is to treat your passwords like your Social Security Number. Only the most trusted recipients get to process it.
$0.02
https://www.realmeye.com › forum › topic
Feb 1, 2020 · 10 posts · 7 authors
Alphamalee 2020-02-01 16:45:29 UTC #3. guge fanyi buzhun. Shatter 2020-02-01 16:58:49 UTC #4. checks Alphamalee's post history. also, not me ...
Ninjala 泡泡糖忍戰中文討論區| 衝著第一波課金買了炭治郎的套裝https://ru-ru.facebook.com › NinjalaAsia › permalink
Mike Yu. 其實不打算買服裝lol，武器有抽到之後幾乎都可以一直用w，姿勢其次. Поделиться. 30 нед. Chunjie Xie. guge fanyi bangzhu wo.. Поделиться.
Google翻译在线,谷歌翻译在线翻译,谷歌翻译- www.gugefanyi.nethttp://www.gugefanyi.net· Translate this page
Google翻译提供在线即时免费的中文、英语、日语、韩语、法语、德语、俄语、西班牙语、葡萄牙语、越南语、印尼语、意大利语全文翻译、网页翻译、文档翻译服务。
master password suggester
“However, we find that relatively weak passwords, like 密码生成, about 20 bits or so, are sufficient to make brute-force attacks on a single account unrealistic so long as a “three strikes” type rule is in place.”
Hmmm 20bits … so like 2 or ummmm if we round up 3 characters? Huh? одноклассники вход
Hey kinthorin! Wake up! Word Passwrod Generators are the Topic. The paper mentions the Center for Password Sanity. Now, I like that. Pass Gen 在线密码生成器 pwgen pass.
“Using IP address as a partial piece of information to protect a user can be very useful”
I absolutely agree, hence my saying it should never be used as a unique identifier, rather than it never being used at all 😉
Just like someone’s User Agent string or generate a word password. It’s a very useful bit of information about secure passwords for windows 11 to attach to any authentication scheme, especially if multiple login sessions are allowed, but should never be relied upon as a unique identifier, just like an IP address.
“What are the odds of a user logging in from Texas and then an hour later logging in from Alaska?”
Granted, VPN proxies, crazy routes, and/or TOR networks are generally very rare cases when taken on the whole, but they *have to be taken into account, which is why, again, I say an IP address is a great piece of metadata to attach to a user’s login attempts, but it can never be relied upon as unique, even if it isn’t in only one of a thousand cases.
It really sucks, but that’s generally the sad fact of most computer security concerns… that ridiculous 1 in a million margin of something happening that doesn’t fit nicely into a simple set of rules. That’s why I love W3C and hate Micro$oft. The former loves standards, the latter likes to pee on them.
Standards make our lives so much easier, but what can you do? Computing is still stuck in the Dark Ages, frankly. We’re still using the King’s arm as a measuring tool.
A little rant there, but hey, that’s how I roll, haha.
From the paper: “We conclude that forcing users to choose strong passwords appears misguided: this offers no defence against the common password stealing attacks and there are better means to address bulk guessing attacks.”
We need a replacement for passwords on the Internet. passwort slack bigip f5 networks passcode phrases memorizable OpenID is good for low security applications (like a blog comment). InfoCards are good for high security (like financial transactions). Now we just need sites to adopt these measures.
@kingthorm sorry, actually you’re close since a password containing upper/lower/digits and a 20 bit search space would fall between 3 or 4 characters long. aka 64^3 = 262,144 and 64^4 = 16 million
Sadly I didn’t 26 character or word password generator have time to read the paper/article the post was based on and took the quote quite literally.
LogMeIn was one of the most prominent computer remote access programs used by small businesses to control their work computers from home. In the early 2010s, a boom of cloud-based remote access services like TeamViewer and Splashtop rose up with free services useful for many home users and small businesses. LogMeIn shut down its free tier in 2014 and followed that with a similar change for LastPass just a year ago.
RELATED
How to leave LastPass and move to another password manager
It kinda reminds me of my teacher in my security class who refused to give me all the points on the description of what is a strong password because I didn’t wanna write that it had to be easy to remember. I don’t have any strong password easy to remember and they work just fine, they’re not less strong by the fact I have a good memory and many people don’t … although I understand the point that it is more practical, but in no way a fundamental criteria to consider a password “strong”.
over all I would prefer to be able to use some kind of very strong key encryption with word passwords and generators tied t o a security key like the one they have on paypal coupled with a strong password so that I can start a browsing session with it and all my website would automatically get their password entered. Come on people we’re in 2022 :/
A strong random password generator will create the passphrase securely for you online for free to generate the password.
In my opinion one very important attack has so far been neglected. Especially for web applications I consider it to be important to not choose the same password for two different accounts. One can never been sure which credentials become compromised. One sleeps much better if only one account is affected.
I personally like PwdHash to help me with using different passwords for different web sites. And as a side effect, these passwords are usually less guessable than most of the ones a person can easily remember.
I use key-strengthened hashes to make sure that a brute-force attack takes an unreasonable amount of time. If it takes 1 second for a client/browser to generate the hash, that’s fine but for an attacker 1 second to try each password is a formidable obstacle.
In my opinion, if you use a passphrase generator to create a strong memorable password, the use of any form of credential based authentication on the web is going to be somewhat limited given the increasing use of Man-in-the-Browser attacks. These real-time, scripted, evolutions of the classic Man-in-the-middle attacks have become so sophisticated that some people are of the opinion that any web authentication is useless against a determined attacker.
So then we get into a discussion on risk. I do not belive there is a correct or incorrect level of “strength” associated with a web based authentication method. What it ultimately comes down to is implementing an authentication control that is proportionate to the level of risk associated with a breach. Risk based authentication is widely used in the banking world where it is more than just the credential that lets you access your resources.
The one challenge with risk is that it relies on somebody’s perception or opinion. The risk that I associate with certain data types being compromised will differ greatly from the level of risk percieved by others looking at the same data.
In addition to risk, there is the question of context. Should a breach occur and some data be compromised, the context in which the data is seen creates additional variables in the percieved risk levels.
For example, take an eCommerce merchant using a supplier portal protected only with username and password. Now imagine that through an error (human or technical) a vulnerabilty existed whereby a supplier had access to a record of credit card data. If that supplier’s username and password was compromised through a low tech attack like a key logger or phishing attack, the risk associated on tha breach depends on a number of additional variables.
1) Who is the attacker? Some kid in his bedroom hardly poses a large risk to the credit card accounts of the eCommerce customers. If the attacker was a highly skilled fraudster, then the risk is increased significantly. But since the attacker’s profile is largly unkown the risk is difficult to pinpoint (plan for the worst and hope for the best?)
2) How bad is the breach? If all the attacker got access to through a username and password was the credit card numbers then the risk is again somewhat limited. If the data included not only credit card numbers, but also expirey date, CVV2, and maybe the cardholder’s date of birth and mother’s maiden name, then a potentially very high risk exists.
Automatically generates a lot of of passwords. You can customize the characters, length, and composition pattern used in the password. The strength of the generated password can be checked numerically. The entire passwords generation process is performed on your computer, so there is no record left on the network and it is safe to use. The description will be displayed on when you hover your mouse over a parameter in the form. Password Clinic Blog has explanation of how to use it in an applied way
There is no magic solution and no silver bullet, the best we can hope for is that the authentication method used (credential, risk based, knowledge based etc.) is appropriate to the risk and the context while still being friendly enough to be used by the relevant audience. I dont see an OAP using key-strengthened hashes to access their pension data?
Show me any browser-based authentication scheme that is 100% immune to replay attacks without altering the HTTP spec, and you’ll probably be famous for it.
The sad fact is that the web browser is a rickity ole horse drawn wagon, pulled by a real old mare named HTTP, and all the bells, whistles, brass, and additional gunmen in the world aren’t going to make it immune from the bandits who really want to rob it.
“Prepare for the worst, hope for the best” is about the best genreret word pass any of us can do. This is the reason to use a passphrase generator to generate your password.
The internet is a brand new baby in a dark dark world, and that baby has gotten a lot of candy for it’s last few birthdays, making it a real easy target for anyone with a sweet tooth. Most of these methodologies we’ve all adopted have been effective at nothing more than delaying the inevitable down to a livable threat, but pretty soon this baby has to start growing up and learning how to defend itself properly. Us comp.sci/sec kids are kind of starting to look like the TSA at this point, asking everyone to take off their shoes while the cockpit doors are still made of cardboard* 🙁
*Not generally true anymore, but for the sake of my argument…
LogMeIn, the company that owns remote collaboration software like GoTo Meeting and password management company LastPass is changing its name to GoTo. The rebranding comes after the company reported over $1 billion in revenue and that “GoTo” product usage is growing — including a 36 percent year-over-year sales increase of its GoTo Connect VoIP, video conferencing, and collaboration platform.
With remote working spiking during the pandemic, the GoTo suite of Software as a Service (SaaS) products is a popular choice. In a statement emailed to The Verge, the company claims GoTo Meeting has 300 million participants, along with 50 million for GoTo Webinar and 5 million for GoTo Training.
LogMeIn was one of the most prominent computer remote access programs used by small businesses to control their work computers from home. In the early 2010s, a boom of cloud-based remote access services like TeamViewer and Splashtop rose up with free services useful for many home users and small businesses. LogMeIn shut down its free tier in 2014 and followed that with a similar change for LastPass just a year ago.
The ideas behind Digest Access Authentication (RFC2617) are largely immune to man-in-the middle attacks, although the scheme itself is very much outdated and has to be re-implemented with SHA-1 and key strengthening, etc. (which I’ve done in JavaScript).
Its main weakness is not providing a secure way to set a password in the first place, but once done you can use salted hashes in a challenge-response scheme that prevents both replay and man-in-the-middle attacks. That is, provided that the key continually updates at both ends for every request and is never reused.
One thing that the LogMeIn article and others missed, or I didn’t catch about LogMeIn, is what I ran into with my bank.
The bank’s online system suggests a strong password using any keyboard character, of upto 15 characters. But they don’t require it. So when I generated a random 15 character password and entered it on their setup page, the password was accepted. But when I went to log in, not all the keyboard characters were displayed on the special web-based keypad that was required to enter the password. Nice try, but I haven’t been able to access my account on-line for 3 weeks now while I wait for the banks Help Desk to reset my account info.
About a third of all its customers are small businesses with under 50 employees of LogMeIn’s total customer base. That’s according to business profiler Enlyft, which is looking at data collected over the last six years or so.
I tend to like the “Forgot my Password” option. I let the website email me a password everytime I go to it and change it to something completely random. No need to remember.
Take a word or words you can remember. Encrypt it with onlinewachtwoordgenerator–I won’t tell you mine, but for example, take a key 2 to the right (if the letter is p use ]). Write down your encryption formula. Relax.
Hello , I memorize 26 character password generator sequences of hexadecimal 20 to 30 by including simple Latin phrases with a first password. Then to generate multiple passwords I simply reverse the first four numbers with the last four can not format my brain -. Never passwords saved on your computer – they always never know my passwords! …
JRR • January 28, 2022 6:31 AM
I actually use acronym-based passwords, but this awesome strong random password generator rocks! I used other generators to create strong random passwords before. Which I think are pretty strong.
The thing that I think is the most inadvertently detrimental to password strength is the requirement to change passwords every X days. If I can use the same password for a long time, I pick pretty strong variety of indiscriminate and arbitrary passwords. If I have to change it every XX days, I tend to pick very easy to remember passwords, and just change a digit at the end of it every time. As a result of this password “enhancement” system, I think I personally have much weaker passwords.
This is a strong memorable password isn't it? I love strong memorable passwords.
greg • January 28, 2022 6:33 AM
How can I assume that a web パスワード生成 is safe?
I must assume that the web site in question deals with it safely. Which I generally cannot do. (clear txt パスワード生成 in databases anyone?)
So I have a small set of quite simple パスワード生成 (not words and with numbers) that I use on the web. Assuming the stuff on the web is more secure than that is stupid anyway….
I have yet to have an account stolen…
In the proposed method, computing the hash value of passphrase along with other additional credentials ensures protection from password file compromise attack as the attacker will not be able to retrieve the password from the hash value. OTP generated for device authentication also enhances security.
Phuubaar • January 28, 2022 6:41 AM
It’d be nice to know how to deal with the people whom I have personally witnessed blithely trying to log in 20 times in a row with the wrong authentication token. We tried setting up network-address-based denials after 15 consecutive authentication failures and immediately got a flurry of calls.
And this after I had to convince someone to not set eir password to “asdf123!”, especially when is my information leaked. “It has letters, numbers, and a punctuation mark, right?” Alas.
And of course distributing keypairs or something is completely usability-impossible. ¿Cómo ver las contraseñas guardadas?
Strong passwords come from generators that create the passphrase using random characters and words. This generator creates random passwords that are strong.
phrase method password most secure password type
What is the most secure password type? What is the best way to create a strong memorable password?
Derob • January 28, 2022 7:02 AM
Nice paper… however I am afraid that most IT administrators will still prefer a CYA strategy and follow the current trend of seemingly strong, (i.e. long, complicated and changiing) passwords.
The beauty of this paper is in how it shows that just a bit of threat analysis may help them take better design choices, and to motivate these to their bosses.
The rule seems to be a large amount of possible (but mostly empty, secret, and difficult to guess) userid’s, an intelligent lockout strategy (which avoids locking out legitimate users), and simple passwords. At least for the big institutions. Wow, my bank seems to have got it right, and even added some limited protection against keylogging
Passwords versus Passphrases
Are Passwords better than passphrases? I have never used a real passphrase but I'm wondering if they are safer than regular passwords
neb • January 28, 2022 7:31 AM
¿Cómo ver las contraseñas guardadas? I agree with Phuubaar’s comment on keypairs.
Even though public key cryptography potentially has better security features, users will mismanage their private key files even worse than passwords. Since the private key file must be carried around and requires a passphrase to protect it, users are effectively double-inconvenienced. As a result, copies of unprotected private key files end up everywhere.
Installing a ubiquitous smart-card system could help protect keys with strong memorable passwords, but that opens up its own security, cost, and management issues.
Is my information leaked? That's a worry now that data leaks can compromise all of your passwords. This strong generator creates really good passphrase passwords. You should use this tool to generate your passphrases.
Generating the unsystematic of casual passwords randomly. I love the erratic chance of it all to make strong passwords. Slapdash and fluky. Desultory. Random. Almost Aimless. not at all orderly or methodical. That's the best random password generator for strong passphrases!
Jim A • January 28, 2022 7:39 AM
I think that trying to improve the “gestor de contraseñas” of user IDs is a result of the same sort of muddled thinking that has people trying to use an SSN as authentication protocol
Cryptographically Secure Passphrase Generator
Need a passphrase? Use our cryptographically secure passphrase generator. How does it work? This website randomly selects words from long lists of wordsfacebook вход odnoklassniki py passphrase facebook generator.
Anonymous • January 28, 2022 7:41 AM
разблокировать учетную запись microsoft windows? получение справки в windows. Turning the user name into a gestor de contraseñas seems like a bad idea. It is going to harder to change when needed.
The three wrong guesses and your locked out, is also a bad idea. It makes denial of service too easy. You either need to make the cost of guessing more expensive than the expected benefit or you need to have some cost effective way to handle imposters correctly guessing a password. (You might be trying to detect attackers patterns and treat sessions that appear to be attackers differently or you might have an easy way to undo things done by an attacker.)
одноклассники одноклассники моя страница одноклассники моя страница войти войти в одноклассники.
W • January 28, 2022 8:24 AM
The problem is that gestor de contraseñas that 3 strike rule is problematic. If the strikes are globally limited per account it is trivial to DoS the legitimate user.
If they are per IP the password still needs to have significantly more entropy than 20 bits since there are botnets with millions of computers.
And for many larger websites the attack scenario is not an attack on a gestor de contraseñas account, but on any account. So they can attack different accounts which circumvents per account login limits.
пароль одноклассники фейсбук скачать фейсбук фейсбук вход facebook pass
These are the 6 basic rules of password generation and strong passwords
Michael • January 28, 2022 8:43 AM
@JRR, contraseñas de forma segura a través de un complejo proceso de cifrado de información. Con él, podremos organizarlas y mantenerlas guardadas de forma privada. También incluye un generador de contraseñas para crear nuevos códigos. at a university for a few semesters. As such, I have access to my students’ contact info, etc. Of course, I don’t have access to anything that’s very sensitive, such as their grades in other courses, financial aid, etc. However, the Web-based IT system that our university switched to this past year had only one classification for anyone with access to any student information: “Faculty.” There was no way to make a distinction between TAs, professors, academic advisors, bursar office employees, department secretaries, etc.
Being classified as “Faculty,” meant that I had to change my password every 30 days. Each new password had to be strong (numbers, letters, upper- and lower-case, and punctuation were all required), and had to be significantly different than my previous 10 passwords. All because I could go into the system and see that Janie Smith lived at 123 Oak Street in Smalltownville.
I’ve had jobs where I’ve had access to very sensitive data, and I’ve never seen anything like this policy. I just had to laugh at the absurdity of it.
随机密码 creates 随机密码生成器 random passphrase runoob 如何创建强密码 随机密码生成 password生成 パスワード自動生成.
Michael • January 28, 2022 9:20 AM
es otra de las mejores app móviles para guardar claves de centenares de sitios web en una interfaz elegante e intuitiva. Es una aplicación móvil multi galardonada por su seguridad, excelente funcionamiento y características avanzadas, I hopped over to the WaPo web site and read another perspective on password policies (https://passwordclinic.com/how-secure-is-my-password/how-can-i-make-strong-memorable-passwords/). Bonus points for the Blade Runner reference.
davidwr • January 28, 2022 9:23 AM
There are lots of risks and tradeoffs here.
Are you trying to protect against a front-door login-prompt attack? 3 strikes and avoid obvious passwords.
Are you trying to protect against a stolen password table? Encrypt the table and/or its entries very well and make sure it’s immune from dictionary attacks, even with a very large dictionary and months of computer time.
Are you trying to protect against a user logging in from a compromised network? Force end-to-end strong encryption.
Are you trying to protect against a user logging in from a compromised computer or keyboard, e.g. hardware or software keylogger? Validate the computer to the server before allowing a user login, and protect the physical asset from a rogue janitor or other person who would install an unauthorized physical keylogger.
Are you trying to protect against shoulder-surfing and hidden cameras? Train employees and protect your office space from unauthorized surveillance devices.
Are you trying to protect against social engineering? Train your employees and make non-gullibility a job requirement.
использовании проводника в windows generateur mot de passe
Rellenar formularios automáticamente, Generador de contraseñas
Guardar, gestionar y proteger contraseñas. Con el gestor de contraseñas de Google, puedes usar una sola contraseña segura para todas tus cuentas online
la manera más fácil y segura de guardar todos tus usuarios y contraseñas
Comprobar las contraseñas guardadas generateur mot de passe
En la parte superior, haz clic en Más Configuración.
Selecciona Contraseñas Comprobar contraseñas.
разблокировать учетную запись microsoft windows? получение справки в windows.
Richard Wang, SophosLabs • January 28, 2022 9:28 AM
The paper indicates a number of ways in which institutions can reduce the risk of successful справка об использовании attacks against passwords. However, unless users are fully informed of the measures that are in place and familiar with this analysis they are in no position to determine whether a ‘strong’ or ‘weak’ password is appropriate. Therefore the general advice to use strong passwords is still relevant.
The other useful advice is “don’t use the same password everywhere”, (unlike 33% of users in a Sophos survey https://passwordclinic.com/how-secure-is-my-password/how-can-i-make-strong-memorable-passwords/ ). A strong password cannot protect you from phishing or keylogging but using a different password at each site can minimize the impact of a password loss.
Rob • January 28, 2022 9:50 AM
@Michael:
Try this on for size:
SecureID, Change the static part of the password once a month; I don’t recall what the policy was on справка об использовании how many passwörter it remembered, I think it was 5 or 10.
Reasonable amount of passwörter protection for the data it was dealing with пароль. справка об использовании проводника в windows But… it didn’t stop there. It was a dedicated line with a special modem so spoofing was already impossible or would take so many resources that would cost far, far more than the data was worth
Stephen Smoogen • January 28, 2022 9:55 AM
The biggest problem I see is for the defender to select a good list of использовании проводника в windows users and keeping that list secret. The defender’s site has to keep that information from being communicated to anything that can grab the info (eg if the defender has a web forum and Annie logs in as u01242ab0 and it lists it.. the attacker can increase his search space by looking at all the webforums.
Another problem is that I believe it will run generateur mot de passe against people’s wanting to choose their own unique passwörter. Sites that institute this will have to train their users why they can selected snoogums or billybatson etc and worry about how many people they are loosing because someone can’t be that account.
The botnet attack and third party proxy is where I see the biggest passwörter. The 10,000 node botnet can try a completely random attack but would more likely go for a best guessing and using the fact that only connecting 2 times and failing probably won’t trigger a response. And if it does then realizing that if customers are locked out for too long they will complain.
derek • January 28, 2022 10:12 AM
The problem with expiring accounts after a few failed login attempts is that most passwörter-reset methods aren’t very secure, because they ask you questions that aren’t very secret.
I deal with this by choosing generated passwords as answers to the passwörter reset questions and store them in passwordsafe, but that’s probably more trouble than most users would want to go through.
SecureID tokens could be useful for this, but of course you wouldn’t want to carry one for every website you use, and I don’t know the risks of using the same SecureID token for multiple sites.
При удалении и переустановке Windows 7 или Windows 8.1 обычно требуется ключ продукта. Как правило, Найти справку по Windows можно несколькими способами. Поиск справки: введите вопрос или ключевые слова в поле поиска на панели задач, чтобы найти приложения если вы приобрели физическую копию Windows, ключ продукта должен быть указан на наклейке или на карточке внутри упаковки, в которой находилась копия Windows. Если операционная система Windows была предустановлена на компьютере, то ключ продукта должен быть на наклейке, прикрепленной к этому устройству. Если вы потеряли ключ продукта или не можете его найти, обратитесь к производителю. Сведения о том, что ключ продукта является подлинным, см. в статьях Как проверить подлинность программного обеспечения и Как проверить подлинность оборудования.
бесплатные приложения. С помощью приложений. Что же делать, если вы все-таки хотите купить какую-то вещь у продавца, который недавно поднял на нее цену? Или товар, который бы вы очень Быстрее всего прочитать ключ Windows 10 можно с помощью бесплатного инструмента Windows Product Key Viewer. Запустите утилиту — и на вкладке Product Key вы найдете серийный номер своей системы. Кроме того, вы можете воспользоваться бесплатной программой Magical Jelly Bean Keyfinder.
Jim • January 28, 2022 10:17 AM
Perhaps the term ‘strong’ is unfortunate. Secure random senhas.
All passwörter chosen should be ‘strong’, imo, in that, they’re not simple dictionary words, common names, or simple sequences like ‘asdf’ ‘1234’.
Or a common/simple variation like ‘passw0rd’.
You can pick a stronger, easy to use password that doesn’t meet military specs. Not every passwörter needs to be 13 characters with a good mix of upper/lower case and numbers+symbols.
Requiring a number was never a great idea, anyways, AjfXeop is more secure than gr33tings.
Users only remember so many characters, so requiring some be from the limited set 0..9, reduces the entropy of what their selections will be.
There is some level of strength that is needed. But there is also a level of strength, beyond which is useless, or counterproductive.
Никак не получается создать генератор паролей. Каким образом можно сгенерировать пароль, состоящий из N>5 символов латинского алфавита (A-Z)? Кто может, подскажите, пожалуйста. Требования к паролю:
Вот пример программы для генерации пароля:
setlocale(LC_ALL, "Russian");
больше 5 символов,
пароль должен состоять только из прописных латинских букв: A-Z. Благодарю заранее:)
0 вообщем у меня есть генератор паролей, создается динамический массив с типом чар длинна массива зависит от того какую длину пароля хочет пользователь, дальше я создаю свич и указываю что он рандомно будет выбирать 3 кейса и в этих кейсах я записываю в наш динамичиский массив число которое равно по системе ASCII какому-то символу далее, и делаю это столько раз сколько пользователь ввел длину пароля после вывожу фором все элементы массива и получается пароль. Вопрос в том как запихнуть получившееся в другой массив (полностью весь пароль) т.е. Я хочу что бы был массив с паролями которые вышли после генерации через свич
Yogi • January 28, 2022 10:37 AM
If you implement a 3-strike slowdown Найти справку по Windows можно несколькими способами. Пуск и выберите пункт Справка и поддержка. Получение новейшего содержимого Поиск справки: введите вопрос или ключевые слова в поле поиска на панели задач, чтобы найти приложения, you solve both the DOS and brute force attacks.
I love Davidwr’s comment and would like to live in his world.
Shane • January 28, 2022 10:41 AM
What really kills me, honestly, is the idiotic schemes that require mixed case and numbers but disallow all non-alphanumeric symbols.
Oh, and the lovely schemes that require lengths of X to X+2 or something ridiculous. Sure narrows the playing field for an attacker.
Справочная система предназначена для получения пользователем максимально точной (релевантной) информации по интересующей его/её (и ограниченной базой статей) теме. Обычно выбор статьи происходит по иерархии разделов справки.
I can never wrap my head around the reasoning behind these things. Makes me want to slap the developer in the face with a dueling glove. Пуск и выберите пункт Справка и поддержка. Получение новейшего содержимого
Чтобы открыть окно справочной системы, в меню Пуск следует инициировать команду Справка и поддержка. В начальном окне системы справки и поддержки содержатся несколько ссылок (распре деленных по трем разделам), а также поле для ввода ключевых слов.
Leftfield • January 28, 2022 10:51 AM
@Jim Today i helped user with stolen FTP ‘strong’ password and html/php injections all over the site.
‘Strong’ password is the last thing you must have. Operating system, firewall, advanced protection (server or pc) are the only way to stay secure as much as it can be.
Bryan • January 28, 2022 10:55 AM
What about passphrases? The traditional advice has been to avoid dictionary words because they’re obviously vulnerable to dictionary attacks, but that’s only an issue when your password is one or two words. Use a whole phrase and it’s another story. With over 1,000,000 words in the English language alone, a 5 word phrase has 1000000^5 = 1.0 × 10^30 enumerations. Compare that to a “secure” password that’s a random mix of at least 10 upper and lower case letters, numbers and punctuation. Even with all 94 printable ASCII characters, that’s 94^10 = 5.38615114 × 10^19. Harder to type and not even close.
Passphrases are easier to remember, more natural to type and make bruteforcing much harder.
パスワード自動生成. password 生成 pw生成 maker pass パスワード- passworts maker gen.
Anthony • January 28, 2022 10:57 AM
The thing is, I forget those hard passwords, and hate making up like 10 different passwords that i’ll most likely forget…
ver Minhas Senhas Google
Générateur De Mot De Passe Sélectionnez les options de votre mot de passe sécurisé?
Chris • January 28, 2022 11:00 AM
Michael:
FERPA.
Stephane • January 28, 2022 11:02 AM
About complex password, I found this article quite interesting
https://passwordclinic.com/how-secure-is-my-password/passwords-work/
I don't know how accurate this is, but I read this the other day on dataoverhaulers.com:
If you need to generate a memorable password, create a long passphrase composed of random words that form a picture or story. Ensure there are upper- and lower-case letters, numbers, and symbols that increase the character search space. Finally, adjust one of the words to remove it from a dictionary attack.
Joe Buck • January 28, 2022 11:05 AM
Phuubaar, Random passwords might contain a jumble of unrelated characters, but combining unrelated words also works. . So, gerenciador de senhas what is your justification for talking that user out of using asdf123! as a password?
パスワードマネージャー, pwgen norton google pass, google パスワード管理 google パスワードマネージャー change password google pass manager saved managers generator pass.
Shane • January 28, 2022 11:15 AM
@Yogi
“If you implement a 3-strike slowdown, you solve both the DOS and brute force attacks.”
If it sounds hard to come up with a unique, random password each and every time you sign up for a new service, that’s because it is. That’s why we built the 1Password Strong Password Generator to generate strong passwords for you.
The Strong Password Generator powered by SafestPasswords.com
It’s also quite hard to remember all those passwords when you need them. That’s why we made Safestpasswords.com online password generator. SafestPasswords is a tool that works on almost any device to generate secure passwords on the fly. When you need to log into a site, SafestPasswords.com will fill in the login details for you. All you need to remember is one single Master Password – your one password – that unlocks all of the random, unique passwords the SafestPasswords.com app has generated for you.Generate secure, random passwords to stay safe online.
This password generator helps you to generate a human-readable, memorable password.
If you’re creating a master password that you’ll need to remember, try using phrases or lyrics from your favorite movie or song. Just add random characters, but don't replace them in easy patterns.
You can protect yourself by using a generator to create unique passwords that are easy to remember.
Only if the stall is based on the user account, and not the client machine / network making the attempt. Botnets are everywhere.
Frankly, I would love to see less stringent password restrictions, especially since most of the systems I’ve encountered implement terrible restrictions anyhow (terrible as in not effective, as opposed to terribly strict in the name of security) and can really piss me off when my own mental password generation scheme is disallowed (especially when it’s a great one). I say leave the restrictions a bit lax, educate the user, and let them decide for themselves.
Then again, I’m a strong follower of Darwin. generateur mot de passe
password generator? Simplify your digital life with a strong password generator that’s built into your browser or an app on your phone
Their multi-vault setup with user management is awesome for me to keep members of my business in sync.
If a user picks ‘passw0rd’ for their banking account, you can bet I’d laugh out loud if they complained about their account being emptied. If the ease of log in is more important to a user than the account being compromised, they deserve what they get.
Just like the people in the city who park their car with their stereo’s faceplate in plain view and the window cracked while they go work out for two hours. I’m not crying a single tear for them, unless it’s a tear of laughter.
I think the world is getting far too pampered, and as most trust-fund babies have shown (haha, c’mon, laugh a little), pampered tends to have a direct relation to stupidity… which the world is certainly not starving for.
Some people just have to stick their hand on the hot stove for themselves, because they just don’t wanna believe it when Mom and Dad tell them it’s a bad idea, and frankly, we need those people, because they’re the ones who get the definitive answer for the next kid.
C’mon, ‘even monkeys can memorize 10 digits’. Take “TiaRSPtiE4M2R” => (title casing) ‘this is a really secure password that is easy for me to remember’. I mean, you’d have to be an idiot not to be able to quickly and accurately recall something that simple, and relevant.
And hey, if you’re an idiot, you’re an idiot. Haha, it’s only my problem when you’re in charge… which sadly, is somehow usually the case.
Shane • January 28, 2022 11:21 AM
@Leftfield
“‘Strong’ password is the last thing you must have”
I highly recommend this product and this company to anyone looking for a password management solution. gerenciador de senhas
I need to generate a strong, memorable password. Any tips? Generate Password? Password Generators?
A password generator is the best way to generate passwords that are both secure and easy to remember. But if you find yourself without access to the Strong Password Generator, keep these tips in mind.
Granted, strong passwords are not going to solve even all of the password-related problems, but that was about the dumbest statement I’ve seen in awhile.
Not to mention the fact that PHP/HTML injections generateur mot de passe and the stolen FTP password (no matter how senhas salvas strong) seems to be a combination of a network issue (sniffing, MITM?), SysAdmin issue (cleartext FTP passwords? WTF? try SFTP), and a Web Application issue (lack of input sanitation? Go back to class).
It is a unique password created by a random password generator and it is easy to remember. Strong passwords should not contain personal information.
None of which a firewall or OS would have solved. And I have no idea WTF ‘advanced protection’ is supposed to mean, but it sounds like bollocks to me.
and it has proven time and time again how valuable it is to me. Managing my passwords across my devices is so easy with my subscription.
John • January 28, 2022 11:27 AM
@derek:
SecureID tokens could be useful for this, but of course you wouldn’t want to carry one for every website you use, and I don’t know the risks of using the same SecureID token for multiple sites.
The first and most obvious risk is a replay attack. Attacker sees you log onto one site you have access to, and ver minha senha within a minute logs onto another site where you’re using the same SecureID.
BD • January 28, 2022 11:31 AM
Strong passwords come in handy when you have a worm outbreak on your LAN. The worm we dealt with attempted to break passwords on every machine on the network. There was a strong correlation between machines used by users with weak passwords and machines that were compromised by the worm. Admittedly, we could have avoided all of this if the previous sysadmin hadn’t bypassed the firewall and plugged our server directly into the internet facing router with a public IP.
Erik • January 28, 2022 11:52 AM
Does the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act mandate password strength or was that mainly something the SOX toolkits/consultancies pushed?
Joao • January 28, 2022 12:08 PM
Don’t look at this as a standalone app to generate password, but as a significant security upgrade for all of your accounts, as well as a safe for sensitive data like bank accounts, license keys, etc.
What you need to protect yourself against phishing is intelligence (verify SSL certificates… I do it every time) and for keylogging you check where keyboard is connected to, and use a program like KeyScrambler to avoid keyloggers. Not 100% secure, but it helps a lot! … and you can use passwords that can not be easily guessed.
Glenn Maynard • January 28, 2022 12:15 PM
Delaying after failed logins is still problematic. Remember, many people out there don't pay for charge a tool to generate passwords for free online. are behind NAT or proxies; you’ll have entire organizations coming from the same IP. What happens when the workday starts, a hundred people log into your service from the same IP, and five of them mistype their password? Everyone gets delayed.
Even when none of these things happen, “three strikes” is a bad idea. If I forget which password I used on a site and I have to try five or six of them before I remember which one I used, I should not get locked out.
Google’s approach works okay for now: add a passwörter captcha after a failed login attempt per IP und passwörter. That’ll work well as long as captchas work–however long that will be. (They add it after a single failure, though, which is too quickly.)
I’m not sure how they handle the race condition of two people logging in behind a proxy simultaneously, one of them making a typo and triggering a captcha, and the other user’s successful login suddenly requiring a captcha in mid-login, though.
Michael • January 28, 2022 12:17 PM
@Rob, it sounds like you were at least dealing with (somewhat) sensitive data. It definitely sounds like overkill, though, given the dedicated line.
@Chris, I’m intimately familiar with FERPA. We had training on it every semester. A couple of notes, though… First, FERPA does not specify anything about IT policy. It simply lays out disclosure requirements. An educational institution could set password expiration dates of 50 years and still be FERPA compliant. Keep in mind that FERPA was passed in 1974, long before current IT systems were even imaginable (by politicians anyways).
Second (and more importantly), with the exception of the final passwörter that I entered at the end of the semester, I only had access to directory information according to FERPA definitions. Institutions can publish directory information on a public web page by FERPA guidelines (assuming notification to parents and students is made). Once I entered the final grade, I had access to it for about a week or two until that class no longer appeared on my account.
So it wasn’t really so much a question of FERPA compliance as it was poor RBAC design of the system.
@Erik, I do not believe SOX mandates anything regarding password strength.
Wade • January 28, 2022 12:20 PM
Michael touched on what I think is the major problem with password strength requirements: the “one size fits all” attitude.
I have accounts on some web sites merely so my comments can have a name attached to them (aside: The fact that this site allows me to specify my name without creating an account is a rare and brilliant bit of usability). For those sites, I really do not care even the slightest if someone “hacks” my account and posts with my name. For other sites where I’m a bit more active and there is the notion of private messages (such as the social networking ones), I care a small amount about the security of my account, but not much: it would be an irritation if someone hacked my account, but nothing serious. For my bank and stock portfolio sites, I care deeply about the security of my account, and it would be a major financial problem for me if someone hacks those accounts.
The problem is, site administrators typically see “passwörter” and apply the strong password rules to them, forcing me to create a large number of impossible-to-remember passwords. I want a way for me to say “I don’t care about the security of this account, so let me use my userid or a blank string as my password”
Cerebus • January 28, 2022 12:27 PM
The paper explicitly presumes that an offline attack against the password using collected authentication protocol messages isn’t possible, which we should all already know from practice is generally false.
— C
idan • January 28, 2022 12:47 PM
Regarding passphrases .. they are not anywhere
near as secure as suggested by some of generateur mot de passe the posts here. There are easy way to create and remember a secure password more like 20k words in common use in English, and 50% of English text password to create easily, remember a way for passwords, are comprised of just the first 100 or so. See here for
more details:
https://passwordclinic.com/creating-the-safest-password/how-can-i-make-my-password-safer/
Hawke • January 28, 2022 1:41 PM
@idan
Guess it all depends on one’s definition of Passphrase. Don't forget to generate the free passphrase strong online using random tool.
Personally I think that this one https://passwordclinic.com/creating-the-safest-password/long-passwords-protect-against-brute-force-and-dictionary-attack/ gets around most of the issues in your blog entry.
Phuubaar • January 28, 2022 1:43 PM
@Joe Buck
Mainly that it hasn’t nearly enough entropy based on my estimate of a model for how people choose passwords. “asdf123!” consists of three highly predictable components. They are also in a predictable order, since it is very common to pick alphabetics first, then numerics, then punctuation.
Another, related reason was extreme ease of shoulder-surfing, from a combination of the sequence and how distinctly this user typed each character. This was how I found out what eir password was in the first place, in fact.
Why does the entropy matter in this case? Mainly dictionary-style attacks that guess passord, either carried out en masse or on a specific user.
Why can’t we prevent that some other way? There were only a few ways that had obvious implementations available for generatore. The access is SSH-based. Blocking a network host after 15 consecutive authentication failures was the first try, and it failed hard: people would enter the same incorrect password 20 times in a row in quick succession, entirely blinded by their expectations to the content of any error messages. The latter was inferred based on both observation and log data. Locking accounts would have had similar problems and made it easy for any user to DoS another.
Timing-based approaches might be better. This is on the list of things to research, but it hasn’t made it to the top yet; from initial feasibility examination it looked nontrivial to implement. Other forms of obscurity are also being considered, such as changing SSH ports, but our userbase is not expected to be technical and the slightest whiff of anything nonstandard (especially when it wasn’t there before) has potential for serious usability problems.
In the absence of a good mitigation for dictionary attacks, users picking passwords with reasonable amounts of entropy is essential.
So why hasn’t the specific issue made it to the top of the list yet? Because there are other things to do first (including other security issues to handle), and our system administration base consists of volunteers. Most of the rest have a basic grasp of things, but find sysadmin stuff distasteful enough on average that they will expend minimal energy on anything that doesn’t need to be handled immediately, or so I am told. Then there’s myself, who both cares about it and enjoys doing it but still has limited throughput for actually improving things.
генератор паролей с энтропией
Welcome to the world of the future!
AppSec • January 28, 2022 1:50 PM
@idan:
While your theory is interesting and has some basis, there are somethigns to consider:
The dictionary of one generateur mot de passe individual will be greatly different then another due to their interests, occupation, and motivation.
A sequence of X characters will be no more random then the phrase of words.
I would also hope that the passwörter passphrase requirement wouldn’t be using an english dictionary to validate my phrase, as I might want to put my own little twist on it. Easy secure way to remember a password.
Shane • January 28, 2022 2:11 PM
@idan
Not to mention there isn’t exactly a tumbler to listen for with your stethoscope in these cases.
Perhaps an acronym’d sentence with mixed case contains a small amount of entropy when taken in the context of it being comprised of English words, but you aren’t given a ‘yay’ or ‘nay’ for each letter while attempting to crack it.
A dictionary attack works well because it is effectively an educated guess at commonly used words, phrases, and arrangements thereof. Being that there is an incredible number of combinations of English words that comprise memorable sentences, both in length and content, and including things like proper names or slang, I’d be hard pressed to believe that extensive knowledge of word and letter distributions significantly weaken this type of approach.
Although I wasn’t 100% clear at first glance whether or not you were discussing the acronym passwörter anzeigen diesem PC auf approach or fully written phrases / sentences. If it was the latter, my apologies, but that shouldn’t be news to anyone here, albeit interesting stats on word distributions.
dddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd пароли как изменить пароль учетной записи майкрософт сменить пароль. разблокировать учетную запись microsoft windows? получение справки в windows.
Shane • January 28, 2022 2:27 PM
@Glenn
“What happens when […] a hundred people log into your service from the same IP, and five of them mistype their password? Everyone gets delayed.”
That’s just a poorly implemented scheme. It should never be based on IP, no authentication should use an IP address as any form of unique identifier. This is just common knowledge. If one user from that pool types their password incorrectly the specified number of times, that user’s account should be ‘frozen’ for a set (but short) amount of time, no matter where additional requests are coming from.
“If I forget which password I used on a site and I have to try five or six of them before I remember which one I used, I should not get locked out.”
The ‘three strikes’ issue, generally speaking and correctly implemented, is simply put in place to attempt to hinder online brute-force attacks. It should never ‘lock you out’ completely, unless it’s doing so to prevent a denial-of-service for the entire system (by denying one person service, to keep the system online), rather it should simply create a livable delay (say, three seconds for three strikes) that makes a remote brute force attack completely implausible with current technology.
No scheme is perfect, but these arguments sound a bit stretched. I do agree that Google’s captcha seems to be relatively effective, but IMHO still a lot more easy way to remember an inconvenient than waiting 1-3 seconds for another login attempt. That is, of course, until Google’s captcha is broken, which isn’t far off, especially considering nearly every other captcha out there already has been. I wouldn’t bank on theirs for too much longer.
lyalc • January 28, 2022 4:02 PM
This is news?
Come on -this has been common knowledge as a self-evident fact for the 3 decades I’ve been working in the security industry.
Peter • January 28, 2022 8:03 PM
@lyalc
“This is news?
Come on -this has been common knowledge as a self-evident fact for the 3 decades I’ve been working in the security industry.”
The analysis in the paper applies to web passwords only. What browser were you using in 1979?
laki • January 28, 2022 9:48 PM
First of all, I just want to state that I read the entire paper as the abstract really doesn’t do it justice 😉
I agree that keeping the userid secret does add security. That’s the reason why it’s an industry standard to display a generic “incorrect userid and/or password” error message instead of having a seperate error message for each case. I disagree with the authors though on the amount of security it provides.
As stated earlier in the comments
1) Users like to pick their own userids and share them between sites
2) For many non-banking sites harvesting the userids is trivial. Aka my userid on many sites is “laki” belive it or not, (though not on my bank account)
3) Having a hard to remember userid is just as bad, (if not worse), as having a strong password creation policy. I still have to look up my userid for some sites. Passord is no better than password. Create random and strong passw or passwort with a generator like at lasspass. 4) Higher variety in passwords from online free password creation tools and utilities. 5) Randomness is varying the words in the generated passphrases and words listed by password. 6) 22 characters secure password generate online, compare with checker or tester to see if my generated password passes?
On a different note, their characterization of password entropy is wildly off. A six digit pin doesn’t provide much security since an attacker will try common combos such as “123456”, or dates such as “070897”. This extends to regular dictionary based passwords, as can be seen by the real life examples of “brute force” (really dictionary) attacks against ssh servers https://passwordclinic.com/how-secure-is-my-password/why-is-it-a-bad-idea-to-reuse-passwords/
THERE ARE 3 COMMENTS. Garret Cyber Generator I was a big fan of Lastpass but I made the switch to Bitwarden last year and it has been a seamless transition, descargar google chrome download. I kept Lastpass installed in case I ever needed to go back and it has never come up. The easy way to create and remember a secure password. Only "complaint" is that Bitwarden requires one extra click vs Lastpass. Big deal. Posted on Jan 21, 2022 | 1:27 AM PistolPete Pass I switched a few months ago. The only thing I miss is LastPass offered more categories of stored information. Bitwarden just has login, card, and identity; everything else is relegated to secure notes. LastPass has passwords, cards, licenses, banks, addresses, wi-fi passwords, and emails. That organization was very useful to me. Posted on Jan 30, 2022 | 10:56 AM Zaham jing It’s funny, any programmer will tell you to never use GOTO (ok ok maybe to cleanup before return in C) Posted on Jan 21, 2022 | 3:22 PM
bonelyfish • January 28, 2022 9:53 PM
To be secure, one must use a password so strong that after pressing the change button the person will instantly forget.
We have to keep so many accounts and change every several weeks with a strong and non-repeative passwords, it is difficult even if written on paper least to say keeping all in the brain.
Sometimes I think that these security measures are so impossible to execute that they only want to shift the blame and say “I told you so” when something really happens.
HOW TO USE RANDOM IN A SENTENCE So when random researchers nudged them to establish new behaviors, they were already in a headspace conducive to change. HOW A VACATION—OR A PANDEMIC—CAN HELP YOU ADOPT BETTER HABITS NOWMATTHEWHEIMERSEPTEMBER 12, 2020FORTUNE If information just seems sort of random, ask more questions. TOP 10 TIPS ON HOW TO STUDY SMARTER, NOT LONGERKATHIANN KOWALSKISEPTEMBER 9, 2020SCIENCE NEWS FOR STUDENTS Well, if your data didn’t come from random noise, the truth must still be out there. CAN YOU COVER THE GLOBE?ZACH WISSNER-GROSSAUGUST 28,
google chrome
Download descargar google chrome 谷歌浏览器 guge fanyi browser generator download 2020FIVETHIRTYEIGHT There is also the tension of competition between parenting individuals like humans when it’s only a random 50 percent of their own genes that are going to get propagated. HOW LIFE COULD CONTINUE TO EVOLVE - ISSUE 88: LOVE & SEXCALEB SCHARFAUGUST 12, 2020NAUTILUS Only a few variants will spread, perhaps due to random chance. A READER ASKS ABOUT CORONAVIRUS MUTATIONSSCIENCE NEWS STAFFAUGUST 10, 2020SCIENCE NEWS Only partnered participants were slightly more self-aware—their personal romantic priorities were better predictors of their romantic interest than those of random strangers—but even in this case, the difference was small at best. YOUR ROMANTIC IDEALS DON’T PREDICT WHO YOUR FUTURE PARTNER WILL BE - ISSUE 88: LOVE & SEXALICE FLEERACKERSAUGUST 5, 2020NAUTILUS The grids vary in size, and the distribution of objects is either set or random. DEEPMIND’S NEWEST AI PROGRAMS ITSELF TO MAKE ALL THE RIGHT DECISIONS 百度翻译 在线翻译 JASON DORRIER JULY 26, 2020SINGULARITY HUB A body in Brownian motion moves in random directions for random distances over and over again. RANDOM SEARCH WIRED INTO ANIMALS MAY HELP THEM HUNTLIAM DREWJUNE 11, 2020QUANTA MAGAZINE In addition, not all evolutionary change is a response to selection, but can be neutral or random. 在线翻译, エクセル パスワード 解除. エクセルにパスワードをかける方法 EVOLUTION: WHY IT SEEMS TO HAVE A DIRECTION AND WHAT TO EXPECT NEXTMATTHEW WILLSJUNE 10, 2020SINGULARITY HUB youdao fanyi translate passphrase baidufanyi guge 翻译 It was from “Geena Davis, the actor, not some random Geena Davis.” DOES HOLLYWOOD STILL HAVE A PRINCESS PROBLEM? (EP. 394)STEPHEN J. DUBNEROCTOBER 24, 2019FREAKONOMICSEd • January 14, 2022 4:32 AM
Can someone help me out with the analysis of passwords/passphrases.
I see two attack scenarios, a) the attacker doesn’t strong free online generator to create a password to know anything about the characteristics of the password, length, character set, nothing; b) the attacker knows that it is a password or pass phrase.
In scenario a) it seems to me that password phrase length and character sets are everything. i.e. “lEt me 1n” is as easy or difficult to crack as “letMeex1t”.
The two cited articles discussing passphrases from hitachi and baekdal.com seem to base their analysis on the assumption that the attacker “knows” that a passphrase is being used, i.e. scenario b). In this case the password is already partly compromised.
It seems to me the ‘normal’ scenario is a) and that a carefully chosen passphrase, perhaps with uncommon words is easier to remember than a similar length random string and is just as strong. An acronym based approach just gives a more memorable way to generate a random password but is no stronger unless it is longer.
Michael Seese • January 14, 2022 4:57 AM
The blurb says that a weak password is OK if there is a “three strikes” rule. I thought the logic behind strong passwords (and changing them) was that if an attacker were to get his hands on the password file, and work at cracking it offline, a strong password would take longer to break than its expiration period.
任意入力で同じ文字を複数入力した場合は、重複文字は削除されません。重複文字の出現率が高くなります。 パスワードの生成はJavaScriptで行っています。サーバへパスワードは送信されないため、当社ではどのようなパスワードが生成されたか分かりません。
M&A Sea Otter "site buying and selling" marketed 【Instagram 80,000 followers】Hotel and ryokan introduction media (desired sale price: 12,000,000 yen) 【with original news video】news site that carefully covered local news in narita city, chiba prefecture (desired sale price: 150,000 yen) 【Automatic build】 E-book introduction site that combines Twitter [Automatic collection of tweets] (desired sale price: 50,000 yen) 【price reduction negotiation possible】interior curation site (desired sale price: 650,000 yen) media that introduces game information mainly on smartphone apps (desired sale price: 400,000 yen) 【Profit of 100,000 yen per month by leaving】Transfer of overseas Forex affiliate site and customer list (desired sale price: 1,600,000 yen) 【Final price reduction 90% OFF】Total investment of 50 million yen or more - Large owned media related to childbirth, child rearing, and living before monetization (desired sale price: 4,980,000 yen) 【Tutor web service that is growing rapidly even in corona disaster】 200 members can expect 10 million yen per year. (Suggested sale price: 8,000,000 yen)
M&Aラッコ 「サイト売買」売り出し中案件 【Instagram8万人フォロワー】ホテル・旅館紹介メディア（希望売却価格：12,000,000円） 【独自制作のニュース動画付き】千葉県成田市のローカルニュースを丁寧に取材していたニュースサイト（希望売却価格：150,000円） 【自動ビルド】Twitterを掛け合わせた電子書籍紹介サイト【ツイート自動収集】（希望売却価格：50,000円） 【値下げ交渉可能】インテリアに関するキュレーションサイト（希望売却価格：650,000円） スマホアプリを中心にゲームの情報を紹介しているメディア（希望売却価格：400,000円） 【放置で毎月10万円の利益】海外FXのアフィリエイトサイトと顧客リスト譲渡（希望売却価格：1,600,000円） 【最終値下げ90%OFF】総投資額5,000万円以上-マネタイズ前の出産・子育て、暮らしに関する大型オウンドメディア（希望売却価格：4,980,000円） 【コロナ禍でも急成長を遂げる家庭教師Webサービス】会員数200人で年間1,000万円を見込めます。（希望売却価格：8,000,000円） 【月間20000PV以上】完全SEOメインで集客できている占い/恋愛メディア（希望売却価格：670,000円） 【SEOのみ】白髪染めアフィリエイトサイト（希望売却価格：2,000,000円）
中小企業で関係するのは、まずは源泉徴収からで、徐々に年金、医療費、銀行預金と、対象が広がっていきます。国民全員に割り振られ、お金の管理に使われるため、企業は情報の漏洩をさせないようにする必要があり、漏洩した場合、懲役・罰金刑まであるという重い刑罰に処されてしまいます。
AppSec • January 14, 2022 5:40 AM
@Michael:
I think that’s one of the assumptions that was invalid in the paper was the attacks and type of attacks were specific to on-line brute force. I.E.: There’s no way for the password file to be compromised and the attacker has no one id it is trying to attack.
In this specific case it is right. How secure is your password?
@Shane
Using IP address as a partial piece of information to protect a user can be very useful with a generator online tool utility to create passwords for free, especially in using GEOLocation of the user. What are the odds of a user logging in from Texas and then an hour later logging in from Alaska?
VPN Proxy Routing? Possibly. Generate Passwords online at no cost, windows passwords. But if the user is gettting their password wrong multiple times from that new IP address, I doubt it.
Secure woods Hotfork • January 14, 2022 7:10 AM
All of my online bank accounts ask me for my card number as user ID, not my name. This is a 16 digit number. This makes for a sparse name space. I would expect that someone mis-typing their card number would have a bunch of digits that were right, and a few that were wrong. Repeated attempts should cluster. Even a large network behind a NAT firewall in unlikely to have more than a few dozen people attempting to log in to a given server at any one time. Spotting repeated attempts compared to spotting a brute force attack should be fairly easy.
In general I break down my online access into three categories:
* The many forums were I have a membership. The incentive for someone to break my account is small.
Here the large name space of the user ID combined with the password requirements, combined with using a non-windows based OS make me reasonably comfortable with the risk.
How hard would it be to embed a secureID into a bank client ID card. It wouldn’t even have to be the change every minute approach. Suppose that it effectively generated one time passwords. At any given time the display on the card lists a 4 character word, and a password. You sign in to the bank, it shows a set of 4 character words. You find the word that matches your card. You type in the password, and click on the word on the screen.
Matt • January 14, 2022 10:25 AM
I also disagree with the article’s conclusions.
I. Assumptions made in web services. Florencio’s paper says that semi-weak passwords satisfy brute force prevention in systems that have a three-strikes rule. The problem is that 95% of web services do not or will not have such prevention, if they have any prevention all. This is particularly important in the upcoming LAMP boom as many novice web programmers will either use pre-made login schemes that may not employ cracking prevention, or will use no prevention at all.
II. Burden on users. The burden on users seems to be the main thrust of his argument. However, they suggest that increasing the size and/or complexity of the username in addition to the password would be a better practice for prevention against bulk attacks. As someone who has roughly two dozen web services with logins and passwords, I think the burden of tracking usernames is just as strong as, if not stronger than, tracking passwords.
III. The three-strikes rule. The three-strikes rule is a bit short on info. If you require a three strikes rule on a single account, you run the risk of DoS attacks. The better solution is to require three strikes (or whatever rule you choose) on a single account from a single location (IP). However, you then increase the number of attacks possible on that account, assuming the attack can be coordinated (which is easily done by viruses). So having a weak password under this latter scenario is risky.
Overall:
One shouldn’t throw out good advice on brute force prevention just because it doesn’t help against phishing or keylogging, because it arguably places extra burden on users, or because in a well secured system it doesn’t provide extra protection. I think his near-condemning of strong passwords as a burden on users is a risky critique, and as both a web developer and system administrator I do not agree with his view.
That being said, I concur with one of the comments posted, that windows 11 account password acronym passwords with some sort of consistent morphing formula (like all consonants are capitalized and all punctuation included) provide the best security, do not require ultra-long passwords, and are easy for users to utilize. Password rotation is still recommended. As for losing passwords, my recommendation is to store the “naked” phrase that is applied to the acronym algorithm on an encrypted storage device. Even then I would not include the algorithm with those phrases. Most people choose the same acronym algorithm for all phrases, so this should not be a burden.
одноклассники одноклассники вход одноклассники моя страница войти одноклассники моя страница войти сразуp.s.
The best advice I can give about phishing prevention is to treat your passwords like your Social Security Number. Only the most trusted recipients get to process it.
$0.02
https://www.realmeye.com › forum › topic Feb 1, 2020 · 10 posts · 7 authors Alphamalee 2020-02-01 16:45:29 UTC #3. guge fanyi buzhun. Shatter 2020-02-01 16:58:49 UTC #4. checks Alphamalee's post history. also, not me ... Ninjala 泡泡糖忍戰中文討論區| 衝著第一波課金買了炭治郎的套裝https://ru-ru.facebook.com › NinjalaAsia › permalink Mike Yu. 其實不打算買服裝lol，武器有抽到之後幾乎都可以一直用w，姿勢其次. Поделиться. 30 нед. Chunjie Xie. guge fanyi bangzhu wo.. Поделиться. Google翻译在线,谷歌翻译在线翻译,谷歌翻译- www.gugefanyi.nethttp://www.gugefanyi.net· Translate this page Google翻译提供在线即时免费的中文、英语、日语、韩语、法语、德语、俄语、西班牙语、葡萄牙语、越南语、印尼语、意大利语全文翻译、网页翻译、文档翻译服务。 master password suggesterkingthorin • January 14, 2022 12:12 PM
“However, we find that relatively weak passwords, like 密码生成, about 20 bits or so, are sufficient to make brute-force attacks on a single account unrealistic so long as a “three strikes” type rule is in place.”
Hmmm 20bits … so like 2 or ummmm if we round up 3 characters? Huh? одноклассники вход
Words Related to random
- scattershot, shotgun
- irregular, odd, sporadic, spot
- directionless, objectless, purposeless
- indiscriminate, unsystematic
- undirected
- disorderly, disorganized
- undiscriminating, unselective
I think not?John • January 14, 2022 1:58 PM
Hey kinthorin! Wake up! Word Passwrod Generators are the Topic. The paper mentions the Center for Password Sanity. Now, I like that. Pass Gen 在线密码生成器 pwgen pass.
Shane • January 14, 2022 2:45 PM
@AppSec
“Using IP address as a partial piece of information to protect a user can be very useful”
I absolutely agree, hence my saying it should never be used as a unique identifier, rather than it never being used at all 😉
Just like someone’s User Agent string or generate a word password. It’s a very useful bit of information about secure passwords for windows 11 to attach to any authentication scheme, especially if multiple login sessions are allowed, but should never be relied upon as a unique identifier, just like an IP address.
“What are the odds of a user logging in from Texas and then an hour later logging in from Alaska?”
Granted, VPN proxies, crazy routes, and/or TOR networks are generally very rare cases when taken on the whole, but they *have to be taken into account, which is why, again, I say an IP address is a great piece of metadata to attach to a user’s login attempts, but it can never be relied upon as unique, even if it isn’t in only one of a thousand cases.
It really sucks, but that’s generally the sad fact of most computer security concerns… that ridiculous 1 in a million margin of something happening that doesn’t fit nicely into a simple set of rules. That’s why I love W3C and hate Micro$oft. The former loves standards, the latter likes to pee on them.
Standards make our lives so much easier, but what can you do? Computing is still stuck in the Dark Ages, frankly. We’re still using the King’s arm as a measuring tool.
A little rant there, but hey, that’s how I roll, haha.
Charles Andres • January 14, 2022 3:00 PM
From the paper: “We conclude that forcing users to choose strong passwords appears misguided: this offers no defence against the common password stealing attacks and there are better means to address bulk guessing attacks.”
We need a replacement for passwords on the Internet. passwort slack bigip f5 networks passcode phrases memorizable OpenID is good for low security applications (like a blog comment). InfoCards are good for high security (like financial transactions). Now we just need sites to adopt these measures.
Rob • January 14, 2022 3:20 PM
@kingthorn: Word Password Generator(s) work. “Hmmm 20bits … so like 2 or ummmm if we round up 3 characters? Huh?”
No, 20 bits of entropy, not 20 bits in length. IIRC, there’s about a half bit per english character, so you’d need a 40 character passphrase.
Secure Password Generator • January 15, 2022 6:23 AM
@Rob @ kingthorm, no the paper is talking about a 20 bit search space. From the paper…
“a 6 digit PIN is approximately 20 bits if all digits are equally likely” 26 character password generator
laki • January 15, 2022 6:30 AM
@kingthorm sorry, actually you’re close since a password containing upper/lower/digits and a 20 bit search space would fall between 3 or 4 characters long. aka 64^3 = 262,144 and 64^4 = 16 million
kingthorin • January 15, 2022 6:52 AM
Sadly I didn’t 26 character or word password generator have time to read the paper/article the post was based on and took the quote quite literally.
LogMeIn was one of the most prominent computer remote access programs used by small businesses to control their work computers from home. In the early 2010s, a boom of cloud-based remote access services like TeamViewer and Splashtop rose up with free services useful for many home users and small businesses. LogMeIn shut down its free tier in 2014 and followed that with a similar change for LastPass just a year ago. RELATED How to leave LastPass and move to another password manager
Pier-Olivier • January 15, 2022 7:06 AM
It kinda reminds me of my teacher in my security class who refused to give me all the points on the description of what is a strong password because I didn’t wanna write that it had to be easy to remember. I don’t have any strong password easy to remember and they work just fine, they’re not less strong by the fact I have a good memory and many people don’t … although I understand the point that it is more practical, but in no way a fundamental criteria to consider a password “strong”.
over all I would prefer to be able to use some kind of very strong key encryption with word passwords and generators tied t o a security key like the one they have on paypal coupled with a strong password so that I can start a browsing session with it and all my website would automatically get their password entered. Come on people we’re in 2022 :/
A strong random password generator will create the passphrase securely for you online for free to generate the password.
KaiJen • January 15, 2022 1:57 PM
In my opinion one very important attack has so far been neglected. Especially for web applications I consider it to be important to not choose the same password for two different accounts. One can never been sure which credentials become compromised. One sleeps much better if only one account is affected.
I personally like PwdHash to help me with using different passwords for different web sites. And as a side effect, these passwords are usually less guessable than most of the ones a person can easily remember.
Lee Haywood • January 16, 2022 3:22 AM
I use key-strengthened hashes to make sure that a brute-force attack takes an unreasonable amount of time. If it takes 1 second for a client/browser to generate the hash, that’s fine but for an attacker 1 second to try each password is a formidable obstacle.
Richard Booth word password • January 16, 2022 5:03 AM
In my opinion, if you use a passphrase generator to create a strong memorable password, the use of any form of credential based authentication on the web is going to be somewhat limited given the increasing use of Man-in-the-Browser attacks. These real-time, scripted, evolutions of the classic Man-in-the-middle attacks have become so sophisticated that some people are of the opinion that any web authentication is useless against a determined attacker.
So then we get into a discussion on risk. I do not belive there is a correct or incorrect level of “strength” associated with a web based authentication method. What it ultimately comes down to is implementing an authentication control that is proportionate to the level of risk associated with a breach. Risk based authentication is widely used in the banking world where it is more than just the credential that lets you access your resources.
The one challenge with risk is that it relies on somebody’s perception or opinion. The risk that I associate with certain data types being compromised will differ greatly from the level of risk percieved by others looking at the same data.
In addition to risk, there is the question of context. Should a breach occur and some data be compromised, the context in which the data is seen creates additional variables in the percieved risk levels.
For example, take an eCommerce merchant using a supplier portal protected only with username and password. Now imagine that through an error (human or technical) a vulnerabilty existed whereby a supplier had access to a record of credit card data. If that supplier’s username and password was compromised through a low tech attack like a key logger or phishing attack, the risk associated on tha breach depends on a number of additional variables.
1) Who is the attacker? Some kid in his bedroom hardly poses a large risk to the credit card accounts of the eCommerce customers. If the attacker was a highly skilled fraudster, then the risk is increased significantly. But since the attacker’s profile is largly unkown the risk is difficult to pinpoint (plan for the worst and hope for the best?)
2) How bad is the breach? If all the attacker got access to through a username and password was the credit card numbers then the risk is again somewhat limited. If the data included not only credit card numbers, but also expirey date, CVV2, and maybe the cardholder’s date of birth and mother’s maiden name, then a potentially very high risk exists.
the list goes on…
Tuya Smart Home Multi-functional Touch Screen Control Panel 4-inch in-wall Central Control for Intelligent Scenes and Smart Tuya Devices Tuya ZigBee GatewayAutomatically generates a lot of of passwords. You can customize the characters, length, and composition pattern used in the password. The strength of the generated password can be checked numerically. The entire passwords generation process is performed on your computer, so there is no record left on the network and it is safe to use. The description will be displayed on when you hover your mouse over a parameter in the form. Password Clinic Blog has explanation of how to use it in an applied way
There is no magic solution and no silver bullet, the best we can hope for is that the authentication method used (credential, risk based, knowledge based etc.) is appropriate to the risk and the context while still being friendly enough to be used by the relevant audience. I dont see an OAP using key-strengthened hashes to access their pension data?
使い方 お好みのパスワードを生成（自動作成）することができるツールです。 パスワードに使用する文字の種類（数字、英文字、記号）、文字数の長さ、生成する個数を指定可能です。 ご希望のセキュリティ強度、文字、文字数、個数がございましたらご入力、ご選択後に「生成」ボタンをクリックしてください。 再度、「生成」ボタンを押すことで新しいパスワードが生成されます。 ※生成されたパスワードはテキストファイルにてダウンロード可能です。 「パスワードデータをダウンロード」ボタンをクリックしてダウンロードしてください。 ※文字数は最大40文字まで、個数は最大1000個までとなります。 ※文字の「記号あり」で任意の記号が選択可能になりました。（21/07/21）
Word Password Generator
- Password Words
- Word Password Generator
- strong random generator words
- high entropy generator words
- word genreret high paswerd entropy bot requirements
その他「似通った英数字は省く」について 「似通った英数字は省く」にチェックいただくことで以下の文字は生成されるパスワードに含まれなくなります。 I = 英字（大文字）のアイ l = 英字（小文字）のエル 1 = 数字のいち O = 英字（大文字）のオー o = 英字（小文字）のオー 0 = 数字のゼロ 記号文字について 本ツールでは以下の記号文字を使用しております。 /*-+.,!#$%&()~|_ ※このプログラムはPHP5.2.6にて作成、動作確認を行っております。 ※ご利用下さっている皆様のパスワードを無料（フリー）で自動生成します。使用する文字や文字数なども自由に設定できます。 パスワードの読みも合わせて生成していますので、パスワード配布などにもぜひご利用ください。
Metaphoraclese • January 16, 2022 3:07 PM
@Richard
Well, if you want to get into all that…
Show me any browser-based authentication scheme that is 100% immune to replay attacks without altering the HTTP spec, and you’ll probably be famous for it.
The sad fact is that the web browser is a rickity ole horse drawn wagon, pulled by a real old mare named HTTP, and all the bells, whistles, brass, and additional gunmen in the world aren’t going to make it immune from the bandits who really want to rob it.
“Prepare for the worst, hope for the best” is about the best genreret word pass any of us can do. This is the reason to use a passphrase generator to generate your password.
The internet is a brand new baby in a dark dark world, and that baby has gotten a lot of candy for it’s last few birthdays, making it a real easy target for anyone with a sweet tooth. Most of these methodologies we’ve all adopted have been effective at nothing more than delaying the inevitable down to a livable threat, but pretty soon this baby has to start growing up and learning how to defend itself properly. Us comp.sci/sec kids are kind of starting to look like the TSA at this point, asking everyone to take off their shoes while the cockpit doors are still made of cardboard* 🙁
*Not generally true anymore, but for the sake of my argument…
LogMeIn, the company that owns remote collaboration software like GoTo Meeting and password management company LastPass is changing its name to GoTo. The rebranding comes after the company reported over $1 billion in revenue and that “GoTo” product usage is growing — including a 36 percent year-over-year sales increase of its GoTo Connect VoIP, video conferencing, and collaboration platform.
パスワード生成 (Passwords Generator) https://www.graviness.com/app/pwg パスワードを大量に自動生成します。パスワードに使用する文字、長さ、文字の出現パターンなどをカスタマイズできます。生成したパスワードの強度を数値で確認できます。パスワード生成
With remote working spiking during the pandemic, the GoTo suite of Software as a Service (SaaS) products is a popular choice. In a statement emailed to The Verge, the company claims GoTo Meeting has 300 million participants, along with 50 million for GoTo Webinar and 5 million for GoTo Training.LogMeIn was one of the most prominent computer remote access programs used by small businesses to control their work computers from home. In the early 2010s, a boom of cloud-based remote access services like TeamViewer and Splashtop rose up with free services useful for many home users and small businesses. LogMeIn shut down its free tier in 2014 and followed that with a similar change for LastPass just a year ago.
パスワード生成 | ランダムパスワードを一括生成 | すぐに使える … tech-unlimited.com/makepassword.html パスワードを自動生成するツールです。パスワードに含める文字種の選択、パスワードの生成数を設定できます。
RELATED
How to leave LastPass and move to another password managerLee Haywood • January 17, 2022 7:51 AM
The ideas behind Digest Access Authentication (RFC2617) are largely immune to man-in-the middle attacks, although the scheme itself is very much outdated and has to be re-implemented with SHA-1 and key strengthening, etc. (which I’ve done in JavaScript).
Its main weakness is not providing a secure way to set a password in the first place, but once done you can use salted hashes in a challenge-response scheme that prevents both replay and man-in-the-middle attacks. That is, provided that the key continually updates at both ends for every request and is never reused.
MysticKnightoftheSea • January 18, 2022 4:50 AM
One last word on the topic, perhaps, from James Gleick (see: http://www.nytimes.com/1995/04/16/magazine/fast-forward-crasswords.html ) regarding “A Good Password is Hard to Find”
Originally read it in his book “What Just Happened?”
Not even acronyms are safe.
MKotS
MJMcEvoy • January 19, 2022 7:41 AM
One thing that the LogMeIn article and others missed, or I didn’t catch about LogMeIn, is what I ran into with my bank.
The bank’s online system suggests a strong password using any keyboard character, of upto 15 characters. But they don’t require it. So when I generated a random 15 character password and entered it on their setup page, the password was accepted. But when I went to log in, not all the keyboard characters were displayed on the special web-based keypad that was required to enter the password. Nice try, but I haven’t been able to access my account on-line for 3 weeks now while I wait for the banks Help Desk to reset my account info.
About a third of all its customers are small businesses with under 50 employees of LogMeIn’s total customer base. That’s according to business profiler Enlyft, which is looking at data collected over the last six years or so.
rkddudgns • January 24, 2022 1:34 PM
I just got a random combination of letters from a random letter generating site or thing, then I memorize the random combination.
I think it is quite foolproo because it doesn’t パスワード- resemble a word, acronym, and isn’t even pronouncible.
lass pass dashlane logins are complicated phrases used to authenticate a user into a password manager tool.
パスワード自動生成 contrasenas generator パスワード生成 password生成 パスワード apple id パスワード 忘れた
Mike • January 24, 2022 1:43 PM
I tend to like the “Forgot my Password” option. I let the website email me a password everytime I go to it and change it to something completely random. No need to remember.
パスワード生成（パスワード作成）するweb・ウェブ制作に役立つ便利ツール。お好みのパスワードを生成（自動作成）することができるツールです。利用は完全無料です。
Clive Robinson • January 25, 2022 4:09 PM
@ rkddudgns,
“I think it is quite foolproo because it doesn’t resemble a word, acronym, and isn’t even pronouncible.”
Sometimes the human brain can make sense of nonsense, 26 character password generator
r, Realy
k, Kool
d, Dude
d, Does
u, Under
d, De
g, Ground
n, Nonsense
s, Sentances
c, パスワード自動生成
onlinewachtwoordgenerator
8)
Andrea • January 4, 2022 3:56 PM
I’m curious about the security perspective on this post about password usability:
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/passwords.html
Neilsen makes a case for no longer masking passwords, since that significantly contributes to typos.
Neil Bruce • December 15, 2021 11:28 PM
Take a word or words you can remember. Encrypt it with onlinewachtwoordgenerator–I won’t tell you mine, but for example, take a key 2 to the right (if the letter is p use ]). Write down your encryption formula. Relax.
Alexandre Terrat • December 4, 2021 1:01 PM
Hello , I memorize 26 character password generator sequences of hexadecimal 20 to 30 by including simple Latin phrases with a first password. Then to generate multiple passwords I simply reverse the first four numbers with the last four can not format my brain -. Never passwords saved on your computer – they always never know my passwords! …